MHB Evaluate 2/α + 3β²: Find Value w/o Equation Solving

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Problem:

Given $$\alpha$$ and $$\beta$$ are roots of the equation $$x^2-7x+8=0$$, where $$\alpha>\beta$$. Find the value of $$\frac{2}{\alpha}+3\beta^2$$ without solving the equation.

Hi members of the forum, I just couldn't remember where did I find this problem but as I have tried to solve for the value of the intended expression, I kind of believe this couldn't be done without actually having to solve the given equation. But I wasn't sure.

Could someone please show me how to find the value of $$\frac{2}{\alpha}+3\beta^2$$ without solving the equation, please?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Evaluate 2/α+3β².

By solving the equation you mean finding explcitly the values of $$\alpha \, , \, \beta $$ ?
 
Re: Evaluate 2/α+3β².

I don't know if there is any other way to do it, but I did it this way :

Let's call $$T = T(\alpha, \beta) = \frac{2}{\alpha} + 3 \beta^2$$.

The first thing comes into mind is whether this is symmetric or not. It's certainly not symmetric, but we can set another expression which permutes the position of the roots in T :

$$T' = T(\beta, \alpha) = \frac{2}{\beta} + 3 \alpha^2$$

Summing up T and T', we get :

$$T + T' = 2 \left ( \frac{1}\alpha + \frac{1}{\beta} \right ) + 3 ( \alpha^2 + \beta^2 )$$

$$\Rightarrow T + T' = \frac{\alpha + \beta}{\alpha \beta} + 3 s_2$$

Where s2 is one of the Newton's symmetric polynomial. Hence, evaluating the expression, we get :

$$T + T' = \frac{415}{4}$$

Similarly, by multiplication,

$$T \cdot T' = \frac{2473}{4}$$

Now this can be easily solved. I recommend you to check my numerical calculations to see if I am correct. I am not giving the final value for T since it's very trivial to solve now. However, I like this problem. it's real toughie.
 
Last edited:
Re: Evaluate 2/α+3β².

ZaidAlyafey said:
By solving the equation you mean finding explcitly the values of $$\alpha \, , \, \beta $$ ?

Yes, Zaid!:)
 
Re: Evaluate 2/α+3β².

Hello, anemone!

I can get only so far ... then I'm stuck, too.

Given $$\alpha$$ and $$\beta$$ are roots of the equation $$x^2-7x+8=0$$, where $$\alpha>\beta$$.
Find the value of $$X \,=\,\tfrac{2}{\alpha}+3\beta^2$$ without solving the equation.
We have: .\begin{Bmatrix}\alpha + \beta &=& 7 & [1] \\ \alpha\beta &=& 8 & [2] \end{Bmatrix}

Multiply [1] and [2]:

. . \alpha\beta(\alpha + \beta) \:=\:8\cdot7 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \alpha^2\beta + \alpha\beta^2 \:=\:56 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \alpha\beta^2 \:=\:56 - \alpha^2\beta\;\;[3]We are given: .X \;=\;\frac{2}{\alpha} + 3\beta^2 \;=\;\frac{2+3\alpha\beta^2}{\alpha}

Substitute [3]: .X \;=\;\frac{2+3(56-\alpha^2\beta)}{\alpha} \;=\;\frac{2+168-3\alpha^2\beta}{\alpha}

. . . . . X \;=\; \frac{170 - 3\alpha^2\beta}{\alpha} \;=\;\frac{170}{\alpha} - \frac{3\alpha^2\beta}{\alpha} \;=\;\frac{170}{\alpha} - 3\alpha\beta

Substitute [2]: .X \;=\;\frac{170}{\alpha} - 3(8) \;=\;\frac{170}{\alpha} - 24I see no way to evaluate X without the value of \alpha.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
946
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top