Evaluating Electric Field for the Coloumb Potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the electric field for the Coulomb potential, V(r) = kq/r, using the gradient of the electric potential. The initial query confirms that the gradient is given by gradV(r) = V'(r)r-hat, and the user seeks clarification on how to derive the electric field from this. The correct approach involves calculating the gradient of V(r), leading to the electric field E = -grad(V) = kq/r^2 r-hat. The discussion emphasizes that using spherical coordinates simplifies the calculation, while Cartesian coordinates can also be applied effectively. Ultimately, the electric field is confirmed to be E = (kq/r^2)r-hat, consistent across both coordinate systems.
jlmac2001
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
The problem is:

Prove that the gradient of an electric potential V(r) which depends only on the distance r=(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^1/2 from the origin has the vlaue gradV(r) = V'(r)r-hat where r-hat := r/r is a unit vector in the direction of r, and V'(r) := dV(r)/dr. Use this to evaluate the electric field E= -gradV(r) for the Coulomb potential
V(r)= kq/r from a point charge +q, where k=1/(4*pi*E0)

E0 stands for epsilon.

My question is:

I proved that gradV(r) = V'(r)r-hat. How do I evaluate the electric field for the Coloumb potential? Would I take the gradient of V(r)=kq/r? I don't get what I need to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by jlmac2001
How do I evaluate the electric field for the Coloumb potential? Would I take the gradient of V(r)=kq/r?
Yes.
 
does this look right?

This is the answer i got:

kq*(x^2+y^2+z^2)^1/2 /(xi+yj+zk)
 


Originally posted by jlmac2001
This is the answer i got:

kq*(x^2+y^2+z^2)^1/2 /(xi+yj+zk)
Check your work. Your answer must be equivalent to:
\frac{kq}{r^2}\hat{r}
 
i tried it again

this time i got, -kq(xi+yj+zk)/(r^5)
 
I'm not sure what you're doing, but keep trying. You're probably making some simple error. Here's how I did it:

If you use spherical coordinates, the gradient is trivial to calculate. By symmetry, the gradient must be along the \hat{r} direction. So E = -grad(V)= -kq(∂/∂r)(1/r), which gives \frac{kq}{r^2}\hat{r}.

If you wish to use cartesian coordinates, no problem:
V = \frac{kq}{(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^\frac{1}{2}}
so, -grad(V) =
\frac{kq}{(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^\frac{3}{2}}(x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}) = \frac{kq}{r^2}\hat{r}
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top