Evaluating limits of rational functions

artwill872
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Why does the limit as x approaches 0 of
x^2 + 5 / 3x go to infinity (with 0 as an essential disc.) but without the +5, the function goes to 0?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried approaching evaluating the limit of the function by comparing the exponents of the numerator and denominator and that seems to work if the +5 isn't there. What is the explanation for this difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean (x^2+5)/(3x), right? Parentheses help. Without the +5, you've got x^2/(3x). That's simplifies to x/3, right? So it approaches 0. With the +5 the numerator approaches 5 and the denominator approaches 0, so the quotient is infinity. Counting powers doesn't really help here.
 
A little more precisely, for x very, very close to 0, the numerator is close to 5 and the denominator is close to 0. That will be a very, very, large number. As x gets closer to 0, the numerator stays close to 5 while the denominator gets closer to 0. That is, the limit is +\infty (which, since \infty is not a real number is the same as saying the limit does not exist.

(Comparing highest powers is useful when x goes to \pm\infty.)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top