Example Problem in the book, why is tension ignored?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of an Atwood machine, specifically addressing why the tension in the connecting cord is ignored in the solution provided in the textbook. The key equations involved include torque as τ = dL/dt, angular momentum L = Iω, and the relationship between forces and acceleration. The book simplifies the problem by treating the masses and the pulley as a single system, thereby neglecting internal tensions. The correct acceleration formula derived is a = (m-M)g/(m+M) + I/R².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and torque
  • Knowledge of angular momentum and its conservation
  • Basic grasp of the Atwood machine setup and mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of torque in rotational systems
  • Learn about the moment of inertia and its calculation for different shapes
  • Explore the concept of internal vs. external forces in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the application of Lagrangian mechanics to similar problems
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to the Atwood machine and rotational dynamics.

jzhu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An Atwood machine consists of two masses, M and m, which are connected by an inelastic cord of negligible mass that passes over a pulley. If the pulley has radius R and moment of inertia I about its axle, determine the acceleration of the masses M and m.

Homework Equations


torque = dL/dt
L(angular momentum) = R x v
L = Iω

The Attempt at a Solution



This is the solution in the book. I have no idea why tension of the string is ignored.

L = (m + M)vR + I(v/r) <- this part makes sense to me
torque = mgR - MgR <- this part does not make sense to me

Following the Atwood machine, shouldn't the forces for both m and M be something like
ΣF = F(tension) - mg = ma (differing signs depending on which is going down, of course)[/B]

Instead, the book has it as ΣF = mg

So then since torque is equal to RF, they get that torque = mgR

But my idea is that torque in this case is equal to RF(tension of m) - RF(tension of M)
which would mean that
torque = R(ma + mg) - R(mg - ma)

After this, we just plug torque into the t = dL/dt equation, and with the factored out velocity that we get from the total angular momentum, get acceleration from dv/dt and simple algebra reveals that the answer is a = (m-M)g/(m+M)+I/R^2.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jzhu said:
L = (m + M)vR + I(v/r) <- this part makes sense to me
jzhu said:
torque = mgR - MgR <- this part does not make sense to me
The book is treating the two masses and pulley as a single system. The tensions in the string would be internal to the system, so they can be ignored.

You can certainly break up the problem and treat the two masses and pulley separately, getting three equations. Then you can solve for the acceleration that way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jzhu
Hm, I just solved it using t = Ia with the 2 forces. So does does mean that dl/dt can only be used from an inertial frame of reference? Or do dl/dt = ia?
 
jzhu said:
Hm, I just solved it using t = Ia with the 2 forces.
If you mean the two tensions, then that's fine. ΣT = Iα

jzhu said:
So does does mean that dl/dt can only be used from an inertial frame of reference? Or do dl/dt = ia?
If you let L = the angular momentum of the pulley only, then dL/dt will equal Iα.
 
Ok, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
933
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K