Existence and Uniqueness of Solution for PDE with Boundary Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter somethingstra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pde
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the existence and uniqueness of a solution for the given first-order partial differential equation (PDE) with specified boundary conditions in the first quadrant of the (x,y) plane. The proposed solution is u(x,y) = g(x + 3y), derived from the characteristics of the PDE. However, the boundary condition u(0,y) = 0 poses a challenge, as it leads to inconsistencies when y exceeds 1/3, suggesting that the solution does not satisfy all conditions. Ultimately, the conclusion reached is that there is no valid solution that meets both boundary conditions. The discussion highlights the complexities involved in solving PDEs with specific constraints.
somethingstra
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Assume we are in the open first quadrant in the (x,y) plane
Say we have u(x,y) a C1 function in the closed first quadrant that satisfies the PDE:

u_{y}=3u_{x} in the open first quadrant

Boundary Conditions:
u(0,y)=0 for t greater than or equal to 0
u(x,0)= g(x) for x greater than or equal to 0

and g(x) = 0 for 0\preceq x\preceq1
g(x) = (x-1)^5 for x greater than or equal to 1

Is there a solution? And if there is, is the the only solution?


Homework Equations



For first order PDE: solution is f(Ay-Bx) where the PDE is AUx + BUy = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



u(x,y) = f(-x-3y)

so that means

u(0,y) = f(-3y)=0

u(x,0) = f(-x)=g(x)

set -x = w

f(w) = g(-x)

therefore f(-x-3y) = g(x+3y)

and u(x,y) = g(x+3y)

This solution works for u(x,0) but I can't find it to work with u(0,y), if y > 1/3, then the solution would be (x-1)^5 with x greater than or equal to 1, which does not satisfy u(0,y) = 0

so I concluded that there is no solution...this doesn't seem right for me. Any help? I feel that I don't actually have to try to find u in order to determine if a solution exists...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, maybe in a traditional pde view, it would be more helpful to think of y as t for time?
 
bump, am I being too confusing here?
 
bump...I have kind of a part two question depending on how correct my answer is.
 
Last edited:
Oh, nevermind, I got it =]
 
Thread 'Use greedy vertex coloring algorithm to prove the upper bound of χ'
Hi! I am struggling with the exercise I mentioned under "Homework statement". The exercise is about a specific "greedy vertex coloring algorithm". One definition (which matches what my book uses) can be found here: https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~laci/HANDOUTS/greedycoloring.pdf Here is also a screenshot of the relevant parts of the linked PDF, i.e. the def. of the algorithm: Sadly I don't have much to show as far as a solution attempt goes, as I am stuck on how to proceed. I thought...
Back
Top