Existence of Laplace Transform of Piecewise Functions

taxidriverhk
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f(t) = t if 0<t<3
et if t>3

a. Is f(t) piece-wise continuous?
b. Is f(t) of exponential order α? Either prove it by producing an M, T and α that satisfies the definition, or show that no such constants exist.
c. Does the Laplace transform of f(t) exist? Briefly explain your answer.

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I know it is not piecewise continuous already.
But can this point prove that the Laplace transform of this function does not exist?
Or do I still have to prove if it is of exponential order α? But I don't know how to find the M, α and T

Hope anyone can help me, thank you so much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
taxidriverhk said:

Homework Statement


Let f(t) = t if 0<t<3
et if t>3

a. Is f(t) piece-wise continuous?
b. Is f(t) of exponential order α? Either prove it by producing an M, T and α that satisfies the definition, or show that no such constants exist.
c. Does the Laplace transform of f(t) exist? Briefly explain your answer.

I know it is not piecewise continuous already.

You do?
 
LCKurtz said:
You do?

Sure, the limits of et and t as t approaches 3 are not equal, so f(t) should not be piece-wise continuous, isn't that right?
 
taxidriverhk said:
Sure, the limits of et and t as t approaches 3 are not equal, so f(t) should not be piece-wise continuous, isn't that right?

No, that isn't right. That would make the functions continuous. What is the definition of piecewise continuous given in your text?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top