Expand the quadratic term for resistance equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the dimensions of a cylindrical wire and its resistance. When the length \(\ell\) of the wire is increased by \(x\) percent while maintaining a constant volume and resistivity, the new cross-sectional area \(A_{\textrm{new}}\) is derived as \(A_{\textrm{new}} = \frac{A}{1+\frac{x}{100}}\). The resistance equations show that \(R_{\textrm{new}} \propto \frac{\ell(1+\frac{x}{100})^2}{A}\). By expanding the quadratic term and ignoring the negligible \((\frac{x}{100})^2\) component, the resistance change is approximately \(2x\) percent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cylindrical geometry and its properties
  • Familiarity with electrical resistance concepts
  • Knowledge of algebraic expansion and approximation techniques
  • Basic principles of resistivity and material properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of resistance formulas for different geometries
  • Learn about the impact of temperature on resistivity in materials
  • Explore advanced topics in electrical engineering, such as circuit analysis
  • Investigate the effects of material composition on resistance
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in understanding the factors affecting electrical resistance in conductive materials.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
A cylindrical wire of length \ell and cross-sectional area \textrm{A} has a fixed volume \textrm{V}. If \ell is increased by +x percent and the volume and resistivity stay the same, by what percentage (in terms of x) will the resistance change?
I said that A\ell=A_{\textrm{new}}\ell\left(1+\frac{x}{100}\right)\implies A_{\textrm{new}}=\frac{A}{1+\frac{x}{100}}. Also, we know that R\propto\frac{\ell}{A}.. Therefore,

R_{\textrm{old}}\propto\frac{\ell}{A}

R_{\textrm{new}}\propto\frac{\ell\left(1+\frac{x}{100}\right)^{2}}{A}

Somehow I'm not getting as nice of an answer as I expected.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Expand the quadradic term, you can claim that the {(\frac x {100})}^2 term is very small and ignore it. Can you see where to go from there?
 
So roughly 2x percent?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
830
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K