Expectation value of Energy Quantum

knightpraetor
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm still really confused on how to go about calculating this for non eigenstates. I'm trying to do the problem below, and am wondering how to go about it.


\Psi (x,0) = A (1-2 \sqrt {\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}} x)^2 e^ {-\frac{m \omega x^2}{2 \hbar}}

So I can't calculate the expectation value using Psi (x,) because this is not a stationary state, therefore i have to get Psi (x,t), correct? To do this i need to first normalize the equation and get A, and then plug Psi(x,0) into the equation:

Cn = \int(\psi_n(x)*f(x) dx))

\psi_n(x) is pretty complex for a harmonic oscillator, being
\frac{1}{sqrt(n-factorial)} (A_+)^n \psi_0(x)

having solved for Cn...assuming i can..which i seriously doubt that i can..i could then go about calculating the energy for Psi(x,t). However, i can't honestly believe this is what I'm supposed to do...it sounds too complex, so I'm guessing either i can for some reason just use the Hamiltonian operator on Psi(x,0), or there is some simpler way to get the expectation energy
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Second question..i've noticed in the book it says i can write Psi(x,0) as a linear combination of stationary states. So I'm trying to tell what linear combination this function is. However, i was wondering if anyone had the 2nd stationary state handy. I calculated it but am unsure if it is right..it doesnt' appear to me to be related to Psi(x,0), but then my mind is fried from so many hours of physics in a row...anyways, I'm off to sleep for 3 hrs before getting up to study japanese. I'll probably check back here sometime tomorrow or ask a friend, and then turn in my homework a little late.
 
For your problem, the method with the integral seems rather "oversized" - try calculating the first three eigenstates of the harmonic oszillator yourself with the a_+-Operator (or looking them up in some textbook), then you can see what the coefficients of your \Psi(x,0) must be and determine A. (Remember normalization).
 
so you basically a friend showed me what they did but i still don't really understand how they got Cn for this equation without integrating. I think they set the constants equal to what was already in Psi(x,0), but it was really hard to place all the factors they got
 
\Psi (x,0) = A (1-2 \sqrt {\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}} x)^2 e^ {-\frac{m \omega x^2}{2 \hbar}} = A (1 - 4 \sqrt {\frac{m \omega}{\hbar}} x + 4 \frac{m \omega}{\hbar} x^2)e^ {-\frac{m \omega x^2}{2 \hbar}}

The first three eigenstates are all polynomials up to 2nd degree times your e-function. Knowing this, you can determine the c_0, c_1, c_2 just by comparison.

So I can't calculate the expectation value using Psi (x,0) because this is not a stationary state, therefore i have to get Psi (x,t), correct? To do this i need to first normalize the equation and get A, and then plug Psi(x,0) into the equation

Basically yes, but the important thing here is not the time dependence, but getting the c_n's so you can write your wavefunction as a sum of eigenfunctions, for which you already know that the energy-expectation-value is just their eigenvalue E_n.
 
Whoops, didn't see your 2nd posting before I replied. Second eigentstate up to a constant:

\phi_2 = (4 \frac{m \omega x^2}{ \hbar} } - 2) e^{-\frac{m \omega x^2}{2 \hbar}}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top