Expectation value of momentum in symmetric 2D H.O

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the expectation value of momentum, <p_x(t)>, for two initial states of a symmetric 2D harmonic oscillator. Participants clarify that the expectation value should be calculated using the same state in the operator expression, rather than mixing states. The momentum operator's representation is highlighted as essential, suggesting it can be found in textbooks related to quantum mechanics, particularly near the Heisenberg uncertainty principle or the Schrödinger equation. Additionally, it is emphasized that the provided states are initial conditions at time t=0, lacking explicit time or spatial dependence. Understanding the general solution for the 2D harmonic oscillator is recommended for further progress.
ma18
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider the following inital states of the symmetric 2D harmonic oscillator

ket (phi 1) = 1/sqrt(2) (ket(0)_x ket(1)_y + ket (1)_x ket (0)_y)

ket (phi 2) = 1/sqrt(2) (ket(0)_x ket(0)_y + ket (1)_x ket (0)_y)

Calculate the <p_x (t)> for each state

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure how to work with these kets, I know that for the expectation value using you would do
<phi_1 | p_x (t) | phi_2>

but I don't know how to represent p_x (t) in the notation used in the ketsAny help would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The expectation value for an operator on a state is <state 1| operator |state 1>. You wrote <state 1| operator |state 2>. Note the 2 in the last ket. That's a transition amplitude as induced by the operator.

Look in your text for a representation of the momentum operator. You should find it near he Heisenberg uncertainty formula, or the Schrodinger equation or some such. You probably want a derivative with some constants.

Notice that the problem says "initial states." So these are not the wave functions. These are the t=0 values. It does not give the x dependence, nor the t dependence. You will need to do some reading in your text to find the 2-D harmonic oscillator and the general solution for it.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top