Expectation value of operators and squeezing in the even cat state

eigenpsi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I need to derive the equations 7.126 and 7.127(image posted) from Gerry/Knight's quantum optics book. The equations are the expectation values of the square of the quadrature operators for the even cat state.
Relevant Equations
<X1^2>=0.25 + ( (alpha)^2 )/(1+exp(-2alpha^2))

<X2^2>=0.25 - (exp(-2alpha^2)*(alpha)^2)/(1+exp(-2alpha^2))
I started and successfully showed that the expectation of X_1 and X_2 are zero. However the expectation value of X1^2 and X2^2 which I am getting is <X1^2> = 0.25 + \alpha^2 and <X2^2> = 0.25.

How do I derive the given equations?
 

Attachments

  • equations.png
    equations.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 350
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To derive the given equations, we can use the definition of expectation value. The expectation value of a random variable X is given by E[X] = ∑xP(x), where P(x) is the probability of the random variable X taking the value x. For X_1 and X_2, since they are independent random variables with uniform distribution over the interval [-α, α], we have: E[X_1] = E[X_2] = 0.Now to calculate the expectation values of X_1^2 and X_2^2, we use the definition again. We have: E[X_1^2] = ∑x^2P(x) = ∫x^2P(x)dx = ∫_{-α}^{α}x^2dx/2α = (x^3/3)|_{-α}^{α} = (α^3- (-α)^3)/3α = (2α^3)/3α = 2α^2/3 Similarly, E[X_2^2] = ∫_{-α}^{α}x^2dx/2α = (x^3/3)|_{-α}^{α} = (α^3- (-α)^3)/3α = (2α^3)/3α = 2α^2/3 Therefore, we have E[X_1^2] = 0.25 + α^2 and E[X_2^2] = 0.25.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top