Expectation value <p> of the ground state of hydrogen

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the expectation value of momentum for an electron in the ground state of a hydrogen atom, one must apply the momentum operator, represented as -ih(d/dx), to the wavefunction. The integration should be performed over the entire volume in spherical coordinates, requiring a 3D integral of the form involving the wavefunction and its derivative. The initial calculations yielded an imaginary result, indicating a potential error in the application of the momentum operator in spherical coordinates. It is crucial to correctly express the momentum operator in spherical coordinates to avoid discrepancies. Proper understanding of the operator's hermiticity is essential for accurate results.
Warda Anis
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How should I calculate the expectation value of momentum of an electron in the ground state in hydrogen atom.

Homework Equations


Untitled.png

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to apply the p operator i.e. ##-ihd/dx## over ##\psi##. and integrating it from 0 to infinity. The answer I am getting is ##ih/{2(pi)a^3}##
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 1,852
Physics news on Phys.org
You are actually trying to calculate the expectation value of px. To do that, you must express the ground state wavefunction explicitly as a function of ##x## so that you can take the derivative. You have to do a 3d integral.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
So I did the following to integrate it in 3d:$$ \iiint_V \Psi^* (-i\hbar) \frac {d\Psi} {dr} r^2 sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi$$

The final answer i am getting is ##\frac {i\hbar}{a_b}## which does not look right because it is imaginary and momentum operator is hermitean. I can't figure out what mistake I am doing
 
You are assuming that in spherical coordinates ##p_r=-i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial r}.## It is not quite that. Do some research on the internet to find out what it is and why.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top