Expectation values and the Harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating expectation values for a quantum harmonic oscillator, specifically for the state |ψ> = (|0> + |1>) / √(2). Participants are tasked with finding various expectation values related to position and momentum operators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial steps for calculating expectation values, including the use of raising and lowering operators. There is an exploration of how to expand expressions involving these operators and the implications of operator placement on the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in their calculations, with one noting that they obtained = 0 and

= 0, while others express uncertainty about their results. There is an ongoing exchange of ideas regarding the correct application of operators and the interpretation of results.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the non-self-adjoint nature of the raising and lowering operators and discuss the implications of orthogonality in their calculations. There is also a reference to the need for clarity in the calculations, as discrepancies in results have been noted among students.

Diomarte
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the Harmonic Oscillator, the state |ψ> = (|0> + |1>) / √(2)

Find \overline{x} = <ψ|x|ψ> \overline{p} = <ψ|p|ψ>
\overline{x^2} = <ψ|x^{2}|ψ> and \overline{p^2} = <ψ|p^{2}|ψ>

and

<ψ| (x - \overline{x})^2 |ψ><ψ| (p - \overline{p})^2 |ψ>

2. Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I got some help from another student on getting started with the first part of this problem, but in all honesty I'm really not even sure how to start some of these, and how the operators work. This is what I've got so far:

<ψ|x|ψ> = <ψ|√(hbar/2mω) (a+a_)|ψ>
<ψ| = 1/√2 (<0| + <1|)
|ψ> = 1/√2 (|0> + |1>)

giving 1/2 √(hbar/2mω) (<0| + <1|) (a+a_) (|0> + |1>)


from here the raising and lowering operators are operating on the nth states of 0 and 1. I know that a_|0> = 0 and a_|n> = √(n)|n-1> and that a+|n> = √(n+1)|n+1> but if anyone can make a suggestion or show me how to get some results here, I would greatly appreciate it. As well, some direction on how to start the next parts would be amazing too, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you essentially got this expression (<0| + <1|) (a_+ + a_) (|0> + |1>). Ok, there's some operator 'sandwiched' between bra's and ket's. Can you expand this expression into a sum of 4 terms and then compute each term separately ?
 
dextercioby said:
So you essentially got this expression (<0| + <1|) (a_+ + a_) (|0> + |1>). Ok, there's some operator 'sandwiched' between bra's and ket's. Can you expand this expression into a sum of 4 terms and then compute each term separately ?

Meaning have the a+ operator act on the bras and then the a_ operate on the kets?
 
Just have them act on the ket, though it doesn't make a difference.
 
"Though it doesn't make a difference." Why do you say this vela? Is it because of the orthogonality and cancellation if you end up multiplying through after the operations?
 
Because if you do the calculations correctly, it doesn't matter whether you have the operators act on the bra or the ket. Why do you think it does?
 
Actually, there's a trick to take into account. The raising & the lowering ladder operators are not self-adjoint, but one is the adjoint of the other, so that

\langle 0|a_{+}|0 \rangle = \langle a_{-}0, 0\rangle = \langle 0,a_{+} 0\rangle.
 
Alright, so I performed the operations and got <x> = 0 and <p> = 0. Two other students I spoke with said that they got <p> = 0 but not <x>. Am I making another mistake here?
 
Ok, never mind, I figured out what was going on. Thank you all very much for your help. After following what was going on, I've successfully solved four of my five assignments! I'll post what I did later on tonight when I've got the time, so if other people have a similar question, they have a direction to go.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K