Explain the difference between these square roots

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the square root symbol, denoted as √, always represents the positive square root of a number. For example, √(4) equals 2, not -2, because the definition of the square root function is to yield a single positive value. The notation ± indicates that both 4 and -4 squared equal 16, but when expressing the square root, it should be written as ±√(16) to reflect both possibilities. The confusion arises from the distinction between the square root function and the solutions to the equation x² = a, which can yield both positive and negative results. Ultimately, the square root is defined to ensure it functions correctly as a mathematical function, mapping each input to a unique output.
greenneub
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I was just wondering what the difference between these two statements are:

V¯(x) = ± 4

V¯(x) = - 4 ---> does not exist.

This is the quote from my text, "...we remind you of a very important agreement in mathematics. The square root sign V¯ always means take the positive square root of whatever is under it. For instance, V¯(4) = 2, it is not equal to -2, only 2. Keep this in mind in this section, and always. "

Maybe I've been staring at the pages too long, but how is (4) different from (-2)²? And why can we right ± 2, but not -2? I know this is basic but I'm embarrassingly confused about this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\sqrt{x} means the positive square root of x (this way you can refer to \sqrt{x} and only be talking about a single number, not two numbers). If the author says \sqrt{16}=\pm 4, he is just making the point that both 4^2 and (-4)^2 equal 16, however the correct notation is\pm \sqrt{16}=\pm 4.
 
As qntty said, the first, \sqrt{4}= \pm 2[/itex] is simply <b>wrong</b>. \sqrt{4}= 2 because \sqrt{x} is <b>defined</b> as the <b>positive</b> number y such that y^2= x. That is why we must write the solution to x^2= a as \pm\sqrt{a}- because \sqrt{a} does not include &quot;\pm&quot;.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And also because that we wish that square-root should be a "function", and for being a function it has to be defined like that only. By definition, a function takes a value from a set A and maps it into B, and no two numbers in A can map to the same number in B.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top