Explicit Calculation of Gauss's Law

Momentous
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a sphere centered at origin with radius R > z0. By calculating the total flux
ϕ = ∫E . da through the sphere, explicitly show that ϕ = q/ϵ0

Homework Equations



Gauss's Law

The Attempt at a Solution



I have a general idea of what to do, but I just want to make sure I don't screw up from the start. I think that I have to do a surface integral. The instructions say to integrate over spherical coordinates.

I'm just confused because I usually think of spherical coordinates as 3 dimensions, but a surface integral is 2-D.

I figured that I would change dA into r^2 sinθ dr dϕ dθ, and integrate from there.
I'd use 0 to R for radius, 0 to 2∏ for ϕ, and 0 to pi for θ. I figure you can take E out of the integral because it is constant and always normal to the Surface Area.

Am I on the right track with this one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh yeah, I should probably mention this too. It goes w/o saying, but there is a charge located at (0, 0, z0) as the initial condition.
 
dA=R^2 sinθ dϕ dθ. You don't integrate over r. It's just a surface. And dA should also include the outward pointing unit normal which you need to dot with E. Finally, it doesn't quite go without saying but if the charge is located at (0,0,z0) instead of the origin then the magnitude of the E field isn't constant either. There is some work to do here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top