Why Can't There Be a Critical Angle When nB/nA Is Greater Than 1?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conditions for critical angles in relation to Snell's Law, specifically when the refractive index ratio nB/nA is greater than 1. It is clarified that a critical angle can only exist when light travels from a medium with a higher refractive index to one with a lower index, which is not the case when nB/nA > 1. The confusion arises from the misunderstanding of how to apply Snell's Law correctly in different scenarios, particularly when comparing transitions between multiple media. The participants emphasize that sinA exceeding 1 is not physically possible, reinforcing the impossibility of a critical angle under these conditions. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting refractive indices in light propagation scenarios.
ZxcvbnM2000
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
Snell's Law of Angles says that : sinA/sinB = nB/nA

but in order to find critical angles B has to be 90° . I understand that in order to have total internal reflection that nB/nA < 1 but why can't there be a CRITICAL angle when nB/nA > 1 ?

sinA would have to be greater than 1 which cannot happen but if i do it separately : glass to air and water to air and say that air-n-water = nwater/nair it is 1.33/1.5 which is true but if i do it in one go it is 1.5 / 1.33 . I must be doing something wrong , because this seems too easy :S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "if i do it in one go"?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top