What force acts on the material of the capacitor in the Graham-Lahoz experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex Barri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The Graham-Lahoz experiment demonstrates the interaction of displacement current with a constant magnetic field, as described by the Biot-Savart law. A key question arises regarding the force acting on the capacitor's material, which is not clearly understood. It was noted that turning on a magnetic field induces surface currents on the capacitor plates, leading to charge separation and torque via the force equation F=qE. However, it was clarified that the magnetic field in this experiment is constant, and the initial assumption about changing the magnetic field was incorrect. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexities of understanding forces in this context.
Alex Barri
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
There is well known Graham–Lahoz experiment

G. M. Graham, D. G. Lahoz. Nature, 285, 154, 1980.

flywhe24.gif


where "dispacement current" interreacts with constant magnetic field by Biot-Savart law.

It is OK! But a question appears - what namely force acts on the material of the capacitor??

I was very surprised nobody knows the answer !
 

Attachments

  • flywhe24.gif
    flywhe24.gif
    4.4 KB · Views: 521
Physics news on Phys.org
Turning on the magnetic field induces a surface current that is up on your picture for one plate and down for the other. This current lasts until it gives a positive charge at the top of one plate and a negative charge at the top of the other plate. The F=qE provides a torque.
 
clem said:
Turning on the magnetic field induces a surface current that is up on your picture for one plate and down for the other. This current lasts until it gives a positive charge at the top of one plate and a negative charge at the top of the other plate. The F=qE provides a torque.

It is not true. In Graham-Lahoz experiment magnetic field is constant!
 
Turning on the magnetic field is not possible!
 
I am very pardon! I was wrong in understanding this experiment. There is no unusual :D
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top