Exploring the Solution to a Harmonic Oscillator Problem

rhysticlight
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am not really asking how to solve the problem but just for explanation of what I know to be true from the problems solution. Basically the original problem statement is this:

A particle in a harmonic oscillator potential starts out in the state
|psi(x,0)>=1/5 * [3|0> + 4|1>] and it asks to find the expectation value of position <x>.

Now the way I approached the problem was to first find |psi(x,t)> by simply "tacking on" the time dependent exponential terms and then expressing x through the ladder operators a+ and a-.

What I am wondering is when I, for example, apply the raising operator a+ to the state |0>*exp(-i*E0*t/h) does the function become |1>*exp(-i*E0*t/h) rather than |1>*exp(-i*E1*t/h) (i.e. why does the energy term in the time dependent part not change?)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


rhysticlight said:
I am not really asking how to solve the problem but just for explanation of what I know to be true from the problems solution. Basically the original problem statement is this:

A particle in a harmonic oscillator potential starts out in the state
|psi(x,0)>=1/5 * [3|0> + 4|1>] and it asks to find the expectation value of position <x>.

Now the way I approached the problem was to first find |psi(x,t)> by simply "tacking on" the time dependent exponential terms and then expressing x through the ladder operators a+ and a-.

What I am wondering is when I, for example, apply the raising operator a+ to the state |0>*exp(-i*E0*t/h) does the function become |1>*exp(-i*E0*t/h) rather than |1>*exp(-i*E1*t/h) (i.e. why does the energy term in the time dependent part not change?)

Thanks!

The energy terms E1 and E0 are constants, namely multiples of \hbar\omega. Put in these values, if you wish, before you operate with the ladder operators and see what happens.
 


Ah o.k. I see now, thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top