Express a wave function as a combination of spherical harmonics

mat8845
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron in a hydrogen atom is in a state described by the wave function:

ψ(r,θ,φ)=R(r)[cos(θ)+e(1+cos(θ))]

What is the probability that measurement of L2 will give 6ℏ2 and measurement of Lz will give ℏ?

Homework Equations



The spherical harmonics

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that I need to express the part in (θ,φ) as a linear combination of spherical harmonics. Then I would normalize my wave function, and the coefficients would lead me to the probability I need.

My problem is to express ψ in terms of the spherical harmonics Ylm. Is there a general method to do so? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way I would do it is by looking at \mathbf{L}^2|l \mspace{8mu} m> = \hbar^2 l(l+1) |l\mspace{8mu} m> and \mathbf{L}_z |l \mspace{8mu}m> = \hbar m |l\mspace{8mu} m>. And looking at a table of spherical harmonics. There is no need to normalize them since they are already normalized.
 
mat8845 said:

Homework Statement



An electron in a hydrogen atom is in a state described by the wave function:

ψ(r,θ,φ)=R(r)[cos(θ)+e(1+cos(θ))]

What is the probability that measurement of L2 will give 6ℏ2 and measurement of Lz will give ℏ?

Homework Equations



The spherical harmonics

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that I need to express the part in (θ,φ) as a linear combination of spherical harmonics. Then I would normalize my wave function, and the coefficients would lead me to the probability I need.

My problem is to express ψ in terms of the spherical harmonics Ylm. Is there a general method to do so? Thanks.
You could find the projection of the angular part onto the state ##\vert l\ m \rangle## by calculating ##\langle l\ m \vert \psi\rangle##. Seems to be kind of a pain though. I'd just futz around with the spherical harmonics to find a linear combination that works. For example, the ##e^{i\phi}## part has to come from an m=1 state.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top