Express the potential energy U in terms of M and v

leonne
Messages
163
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a finite isothermal sphere with a radius R and circular velocity v (remember,
the rotation curve is constant), we derived the total mass and potential energy as
M =v2R/G

U = -GM2/R
Express the potential energy U in terms of M and v. Use the virial theorem to
fi nd the kinetic energy K and total energy E (again in terms of M and v).



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Kind of confused about the first part to find potential in terms of m and v.
Would I just sub total mass equation into potential? I get U=-v4R/G
Is this right? Hmm seems like what i did is wrong. Is it saying that the potential energy can only have M and V?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It said m and v so I would think you would want to have
U=-v^2 M
 
O yea seems that would work you would get the same units when u get the answer thxs
 
For this part
Use the virial theorem to
fi nd the kinetic energy K and total energy E (again in terms of M and v).
Would the answers be k=-v^2M/2 E=v^2m/2
I think the virial theorem is E=-(K)=(U/2)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top