Expressing velocity as a function of the distance (not time elapsed)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the velocity of an 8 lb. object as a function of distance rather than time, given a pulling force proportional to distance, friction, and air resistance. The initial approach involved expressing velocity in terms of time, leading to a complex equation that was difficult to solve. A more effective method was suggested, which involves rearranging the differential equation to relate velocity directly to distance. By substituting variables and using standard techniques, the problem can be simplified, ultimately leading to the desired velocity formula. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly framing the problem to find a solution efficiently.
Beez
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi, I encountered the great difficulty solving the following question.
(The reason why its is hard is because I have to express the velocity as a function of the distance of the object has traveled in stead of as a function of the time elapsed.)

Starting from rest at t=0, an 8 lb. object is pulled along a surface with a force that is equal to twice the distance (in feet) of the object from its starting point x=0. The coefficient of sliding friction is 1/4.
The air resistance is numerically equal to one-eight the square of the velocity (in feet/second).
What is the velocity formula of the object as a function of the distance of the object has traveled?

So, weight = 8lb.
m=\frac{8}{32}=\frac{1}{4}
Air Resistance = \frac{1}{8}v^2
Friction = \frac{-1}{4}8 = -2
Pulling force = 2x


First I tried to write the velocity formula as a function of the time elapsed. The I got

\frac{1}{4}\frac{dv}{dt}=2x - 2-\frac{1}{8}v^2
2\frac{dv}{dt}=16x - 16-v^2
\frac{dv}{v^2+16}=(-8x)dt
Integrate, I had
-0.004363tan^-^1(0.25v)=8xt+C
Applying the I.C., v(0)=0
c = 0
so, tan^-^1(0.25v)=\frac{-8xt}{0.004363}
I don't know how to solve this equation for v from here.

Besides, the answer provided for this problem was v=\sqrt{16x-32+32e^-^x}
which gives me the idea that my approach is off and should be a way to obtain the desired formula without obtaining the formula as a function of time elapsed first...

What is the best way to attack this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beez said:
Hi, I encountered the great difficulty solving the following question.
(The reason why its is hard is because I have to express the velocity as a function of the distance of the object has traveled in stead of as a function of the time elapsed.)

Starting from rest at t=0, an 8 lb. object is pulled along a surface with a force that is equal to twice the distance (in feet) of the object from its starting point x=0. The coefficient of sliding friction is 1/4.
The air resistance is numerically equal to one-eight the square of the velocity (in feet/second).
What is the velocity formula of the object as a function of the distance of the object has traveled?

So, weight = 8lb.
m=\frac{8}{32}=\frac{1}{4}
Air Resistance = \frac{1}{8}v^2
Friction = \frac{-1}{4}8 = -2
Pulling force = 2x


First I tried to write the velocity formula as a function of the time elapsed. The I got

\frac{1}{4}\frac{dv}{dt}=2x - 2-\frac{1}{8}v^2
2\frac{dv}{dt}=16x - 16-v^2
\frac{dv}{v^2+16}=(-8x)dt
Integrate, I had
-0.004363tan^-^1(0.25v)=8xt+C
Applying the I.C., v(0)=0
c = 0
so, tan^-^1(0.25v)=\frac{-8xt}{0.004363}
I don't know how to solve this equation for v from here.

Besides, the answer provided for this problem was v=\sqrt{16x-32+32e^-^x}
which gives me the idea that my approach is off and should be a way to obtain the desired formula without obtaining the formula as a function of time elapsed first...

What is the best way to attack this problem?
begin with your correct equation:

2\frac{dv}{dt} \ = \ 16x - 16-v^2

rearrange terms:

\frac{dv}{dt} + \frac{v^2}{2} \ = \ 8x - 8

then use:

\frac{dv}{dt} \ = \ \frac{dv}{dx} \cdot \frac{dx}{dt} \ = \ \frac{dv}{dx} \cdot v

so that placing this result into the diff eq:

v\frac{dv}{dx} + \frac{v^2}{2} \ = \ 8x - 8

or:

2v\frac{dv}{dx} + v^2 \ = \ 16x - 16

\frac{d(v^{2})}{dx} + v^2 \ = \ 16x - 16

now let y=v2 and solve for y(x) using standard techniques.
 
Last edited:
geosonel said:
begin with your correct equation:

2\frac{dv}{dt} \ = \ 16x - 16-v^2

rearrange terms:

\frac{dv}{dt} + \frac{v^2}{2} \ = \ 8x - 8

then use:

\frac{dv}{dt} \ = \ \frac{dv}{dx} \cdot \frac{dx}{dt} \ = \ \frac{dv}{dx} \cdot v

so that placing this result into the diff eq:

v\frac{dv}{dx} + \frac{v^2}{2} \ = \ 8x - 8

or:

2v\frac{dv}{dx} + v^2 \ = \ 16x - 16

\frac{d(v^{2})}{dx} + v^2 \ = \ 16x - 16

now let y=v2 and solve for y(x) using standard techniques.

this is correct

marlon
 
Thanks for helping me again geosonel. I got it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top