External gravity field independent of mass distribution?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss' law for gravity indicates that the gravitational flux through a surface is proportional to the total enclosed mass. A redistribution of mass within a continuous mass distribution does not affect the total gravitational flux through the surface, meaning gravity remains unchanged over that surface. However, the gravitational field can vary across different sections of the surface despite the total flux remaining constant. This highlights the nonuniqueness of mass distributions in potential field theory. The argument presented confirms that gravity on an equipotential surface is unaffected by mass redistribution.
JP O'Donnell
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi.

Gauss' law applied to gravity states that the gravitational flux through a given surface is proportional to the total enclosed mass.

Considering a gaussian surface which encloses a continuous mass distribution, an arbitrary re-distribution of the total mass must yield the same value for the gravitational flux over the same surface. And since the surface integration element has not changed this means that gravity has not changed over the surface.

This is just the nonuniqueness of causative source distributions in potential field theory.

Are there any errors in the above argument?

Basically all I want to confirm is that a redistribution of mass within a given equipotential surface does not alter gravity on that surface.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JP O'Donnell said:
Considering a gaussian surface which encloses a continuous mass distribution, an arbitrary re-distribution of the total mass must yield the same value for the gravitational flux over the same surface.
The total flux through the closed surface doesn't change.
And since the surface integration element has not changed this means that gravity has not changed over the surface.
But the flux/field through any particular section of the surface can certainly change.
 
thanks. Appreciate your help.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top