External Torque-Force Relation of Bolt

  • Thread starter Thread starter srosendal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bolt Relation
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the torque needed to move a heavy object using a bolt, with a specific emphasis on overcoming friction. The user is trying to apply a formula that considers torque, force, friction coefficient, and bolt diameter but is unsure if it accurately reflects external force calculations. It is noted that a larger bolt diameter can require excessive torque, and the pitch of the thread has minimal impact on the required force. Suggestions include using smaller diameter bolts, lubrication methods, and alternative designs like ball screws to reduce torque requirements. The conversation highlights the counterintuitive nature of using smaller bolts for easier movement under certain conditions.
srosendal
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi there everybody

I have a nice little problem which might not be so complicated after all.

I need to push a heavy object using torque applied on a bolt. This is done manually, and the necessary torque needed is of interets. The attachment explains it quite well, I think.

To overcome friction, the needed horisontal force to get moving is approximately 10 kN and the data of the metric bolt is as follows:

Diameter = 30 mm
Pitch = 1 mm (fine)

So to be able to push the block with F, T is to be found.

Suggestions anyone ?
 

Attachments

  • Bolt Torque Force Calculation.png
    Bolt Torque Force Calculation.png
    14 KB · Views: 3,488
Engineering news on Phys.org
My attempt is currently to use

T = F * K * D
T = Torque
F = Force
K = Friction coefficient
D = Diameter of bolt

But my current understanding of this formula, is that it calculates the internal force of the bolt (as to estimate whether the bolt will break) - therefore I'm not sure if it will work on calculating the external force
 
Agree with 10.2kN. For that force, a 30mm bolt is hugely oversized, requiring too much torque. The fine pitch needs too many turns but doesn't reduce the torque.

For comparison, an M16 10.9 pulls 100kN at usual pre-tension.

The torque results essentially from friction at the screw:
- At the thread. Take the radius at mean thread depth, multiply by the friction coefficient (for instance 0.12 depending on materials and lubrication).
- At the screw's tip. You might take 2/3 of the radius, and some friction coefficient.
- The thread's pitch contributes very little! Compare it with the circumference.

To reduce the torque:
- Take a diameter as small as possible, that is about M5 or M6 (or even less with special steel) as long as it doesn't buckle.
- Lubricate with MoS2 powder (that's really dirty) or MoS2 grease.
- Cover all parts with Ptfe-impregnated nickel. Damned efficient, clean.
- Use a ball screw, as everyone does.

To reduce the number of turns, have a big pitch, which usually means a trapezium-shaped profile.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Great thanks for the reply and the tips on design. I have some constraints regarding changes in the design, but I thank you for the inputs, and I will consider them.

I guess in this case that it is the friction between bolt and thread that is of greatest concern and the pitch is almost negligible. I just find it a little counter-intuitive, that it will be more easy to move the object with a small bolt than a large one (that is if the load is below bolt yield/buckling), and also that you need almost the same force to move a heavy object with a 1 mm pictch as a 3 mm pitch.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
160K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K