'Extra' terms in Abelian Higgs model

  • Thread starter Thread starter bomanfishwow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs Model Terms
bomanfishwow
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I'm taking 5 mins (hours) during some down-time to remind myself of some theory. Taking a simple Abelian Higgs model, where the Lagrangian is given by:

\mathcal{L} = |D_\mu\Phi|^2 - \frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} - V(\Phi)

With the covariant derivative, field strength tensor and potential given by:

D_\mu = \delta_\mu - ig_\mu,
F_{\mu\nu} = \delta_\nu A_\mu - \delta_\mu A_\nu,
V(\Phi) = \lambda|\bar{\Phi}\Phi|^2 - \mu^2\bar{\Phi}\Phi.

I'm working in the unitary gauge, such that \Phi is given by:

\Phi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(v + H\right).

Taking the expanded potential after symmetry breaking, and plugging into |D_\mu\Phi|^2 like:

|D_\mu\Phi|^2 = D_\mu\Phi^*D^\mu\Phi = \frac{1}{2}\left[\left(\delta_\mu +igA_\mu\right)\left(v+H\right)\left(\delta^\mu - igA^\mu\right)\left(v+H\right)\right]

yields the expected interaction and mass terms. Some of the 'extra' terms trivially cancel as they contain derivatives of constants such as \delta_\mu v. However, there are some extra terms which I don't see mentioned in the standard texts:

-ig\left[\delta_\mu H\right] HA^\mu
-igv\delta_\mu HA^\mu
igHA_\mu\delta^\mu H
igvA_\mu\delta^\mu H.

Can anyone suggest a) if I've done something wrong b) if these terms also disappear c) Something else...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did it right, and those 4 terms cancel one another.

|D_{\mu}\phi|^2 = \frac{1}{2} [(\partial_{\mu} - ieA_{\mu})(v+H)] [(\partial^{\mu} + ieA^{\mu})(v+H)] = \frac{1}{2}[\partial_{\mu}H\partial^{\mu}H + e^2A_{\mu}A^{\mu}(v+H)^2 + ieA^{\mu}(v+H)\partial_{\mu}H - ieA_{\mu}(v+H)\partial^{\mu}H]

Because of the summation over \mu, we have for the third term ieA^{\mu}(v+H)\partial_{\mu}H = ieA_{\mu}(v+H)\partial^{\mu}H, cancelling the last term.

Cheers,
Sebas
 
Ah yes of course, thank you.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top