Extremely hard special relativity (2 particles with different speeds)

71GA
Messages
208
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have a 2 unstable particles moving in the ##\scriptsize xy## frame. The leading one has speed ##\scriptsize u_2=0.99c## while the other has speed ##\scriptsize u_1 < u_2##. When the distance between them is ##\scriptsize 100m## in the ##\scriptsize xy## frame they both seem to explode at the same time in ##\scriptsize xy##.

How much time does it pass between explosions in frame of the faster particle. Which particle does explode first in this system?

Homework Equations



  • Lorentz transformations (i think only for standard configuration)
  • time dilation
  • length contraction

The Attempt at a Solution


First i draw the image:


First i calculate ##\scriptsize \gamma_2##:

\begin{align}
\gamma_2 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1- 0.99^2}} = 7.09
\end{align}

I know is that if two events happen at the same time in some system that system measures proper length ##\scriptsize \ell##. So i can conclude that ##\Delta x \equiv \ell##. With respect to this i can calculate the distance ##\scriptsize \Delta x_2' = \tfrac{1}{\gamma} \Delta x = \tfrac{1}{50.25}100m \approx 1.99m##.

Question 1: I think that the calculated distance ##\scriptsize \Delta x'_2## is the distance between the events in frame ##\scriptsize x'_2,y'_2## if particle in system ##\scriptsize x'_1,y'_1## would be moving with speed ##\scriptsize u_2=u_1##. I am not sure about my interpretation and need help.

Now i try to continue and use the fact that events happen at the same time in ##\scriptsize xy## frame ##\scriptsize \longrightarrow \Delta t = 0##. I know i have to use this in Lorentz transformations which i have to write 2 times (first time to connect the frame ##\scriptsize xy## with ##\scriptsize x'_1y'_1## and second time to connect frame ##\scriptsize xy## with ##\scriptsize x'_2y'_2## - i use ##\scriptsize \gamma_1, u_1## & ##\scriptsize \gamma_2,u_2## respectively). Let's do this:

Connecting the ##\scriptsize xy## with ##\scriptsize x'_1y'_1##:
\begin{align}
\Delta x &= \gamma_1 \left(\Delta x'_1 + u_1 \Delta t_1' \right) & \Delta t &= \gamma_1 \left(\Delta t_1' + \Delta x'_1 \tfrac{u_1}{c^2}\right)\\
\Delta x_1' &= \gamma_1 \left(\Delta x - u_1 \Delta t \right) & \Delta t_1' &= \gamma_1 \left(\Delta t - \Delta x \tfrac{u_1}{c^2}\right)\\
\end{align}
Connecting the ##\scriptsize xy## with ##\scriptsize x'_2y'_2##:
\begin{align}
\Delta x &= \gamma_2 \left(\Delta x'_2 + u_2 \Delta t_2' \right) & \Delta t &= \gamma_2 \left(\Delta t_2' + \Delta x'_2 \tfrac{u_2}{c^2}\right)\\
\Delta x_2' &= \gamma_2 \left(\Delta x - u_2 \Delta t \right) & \Delta t_2' &= \gamma_2 \left(\Delta t - \Delta x \tfrac{u_2}{c^2}\right)\\
\end{align}

If i apply the ##\boxed{\Delta t = 0}## i get some speciffic Lorentz transformations (which i marked A,B,C... for easier comunication):

Connecting the ##\scriptsize xy## with ##\scriptsize x'_1y'_1##:
\begin{align}
&(A) & \Delta x &= \gamma_1 \left(\Delta x'_1 + u_1 \Delta t_1' \right) & &(B) & 0 &= \gamma_1 \left(\Delta t_1' + \Delta x'_1 \tfrac{u_1}{c^2}\right)\\
&(C) & \Delta x_1' &= \gamma_1 \Delta x & &(D) & \Delta t_1' &= - \gamma_1 \Delta x \tfrac{u_1}{c^2}\\
\end{align}
Connecting the ##\scriptsize xy## with ##\scriptsize x'_2y'_2##:
\begin{align}
&(E) & \Delta x &= \gamma_2 \left(\Delta x'_2 + u_2 \Delta t_2' \right) & &(F) & 0 &= \gamma_2 \left(\Delta t_2' + \Delta x'_2 \tfrac{u_2}{c^2}\right)\\
&(G) & \Delta x_2' &= \gamma_2 \Delta x & &(H) & \Delta t_2' &= - \gamma_2 \Delta x \tfrac{u_2}{c^2}\\
\end{align}

Question 2: I noticed that (C) and (G) say that ##\scriptsize \Delta x'_1## and ##\scriptsize \Delta x'_2## will be larger than ##\scriptsize \Delta x##. I don't understand this yet and need some help here.

This is what i ve been able to do so far. I would appreciate if anyone would help me to finish i would be gratefull :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your numerical calculation of ##\gamma_2##, I think you set it up ok but didn't evaluate it correctly.

In all of the equations that you wrote down, which quantity represents what you are asked to find?
 
TSny said:
Check your numerical calculation of ##\gamma_2##, I think you set it up ok but didn't evaluate it correctly.
Thank you. I was so sloppy. I did fix the ##\gamma_2##. The right value is ##\gamma_2 = 7.09##
TSny said:
In all of the equations that you wrote down, which quantity represents what you are asked to find?
First i need to find ##\Delta t_2'##. By "all" did you mean A,B,C,D and E,F,G,H?
 
71GA said:
I did fix the ##\gamma_2##. The right value is ##\gamma_2 = 7.09##

First i need to find ##\Delta t_2'##.

Yes. So, which of equations E-H will get you the answer?
 
TSny said:
Yes. So, which of equations E-H will get you the answer?
Equations (E), (F) and (H) i presume. Let me try this.
 
Here is what I think is a simpler way. Call the xy frame of reference S, and the frame of reference of the faster particle S'. Let both particles explode at time t = 0, as reckoned by the observers in the S frame of reference, and let the slower particle be located at x = 0, and the faster particle be located at x = 100 m at t = 0. As reckoned by the observers in the S' frame of reference, let the slower particle explode at x ' = 0 and at at time t' = 0 (according to the synchronized clocks of the S' frame of reference). So, for Event 1, you have:

x = 0, t = 0
x' = 0, t' = 0

Let Event 2 be the explosion of the faster particle. For event 2,

x = 100 m, t = 0
x' = ?? m, t' = ?? sec

You need to use the Lorentz Transformation to determine the ??s in S' for the second event.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top