1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

F(x,v) = kvx

  1. Sep 11, 2005 #1
    I was given the following problem for a homework assignment:

    Given F(x,v) = kvx where k is positive and the velocity is v-nought at x = 0, t = 0, what is x as a function of time?

    First I derived v as a function of position:

    v = v-nought + kx^2/2m

    Then, I derived x as a function of time:

    x = Sqrt[2mv-nought/k]tan(t*Sqrt[kv-nought/2m])

    My problem with this solution is that x is then undefined for various points in time, plus the fact that it jumps from inifnity to negative infinity when it is undefined.

    Now, if this is correct, it can be used as proof that the function as given cannot conform to anything in reality. However, it just may be plain out wrong. If it is wrong, I was wondering if someone might supply me with the correct answer as well as how to go about getting it.

    Thank you very much for your time.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2005
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 12, 2005 #2

    James R

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    F(x,v) doesn't seem to tell us anything useful. It's just a random function, as far as I can see. Therefore, v is unconstrained, and x could be anything as a function of time.

    Edit to add:

    Ah...hang on. Is F a force?
     
  4. Sep 12, 2005 #3

    James R

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    If F = kvx is the force on the particle, then:

    ma = kvx,

    which means

    [tex]m \frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} = kx \frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

    Can you solve that differential equation?
     
  5. Sep 12, 2005 #4
    Yes, it is a force, and I wrote kvx = ma = mv(dv/dx).

    So, kx/m dx = dv, and

    kx^2/2m = v - v-nought.

    Therefore, v = v-nought + kx^2/2m = dx/dt.

    I then seperated variables again and solved for x as a function of time, which resulted in my result written up in my first post, aloing with the problems it carries.
     
  6. Sep 12, 2005 #5

    James R

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Ah, yes. I forgot that a = v(dv/dx).

    I haven't checked your final answer, but it's probably correct. Your conclusion that the force is unrealistic seems sensible to me.
     
  7. Sep 12, 2005 #6
    Thank you.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: F(x,v) = kvx
  1. V(t) and x(t) (Replies: 1)

  2. Confusion about P=F*v! (Replies: 5)

Loading...