Fake Moon Landing: Evidence, Flags & Remnants | Part 1-3

  • Thread starter Thread starter sneez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Moon landing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the debate surrounding the authenticity of the moon landing, with participants asserting that substantial evidence supports its occurrence. Questions are raised about the feasibility of using telescopes to view the U.S. flags and remnants on the moon as definitive proof. However, it is noted that telescopes cannot resolve such small objects from vast distances, and any evidence presented by conspiracy theorists is often flawed or misleading. Participants emphasize that the moon landing is a monumental achievement supported by irrefutable evidence, dismissing claims of a hoax as unfounded. Ultimately, the consensus is that the moon landing did indeed happen, and the arguments against it have been thoroughly debunked.
sneez
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
part 1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1913474363747128107
part 2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5737681932896358451
part 3

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2265515730495966561

now, they produce huge amount of evidence that indeed moon landing happened in the studio...

my question appart can you dispute that evidence is: is there a possibility of telescope being able to see the U.S flags on the moon? That would be ultimate proof of the landing on the moon. Maybe the remnants of landing module would be more suitable object to view. is it possilble?

is there any such photos?

thanx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Telescopes aren't capable of resolving such small things at such tremendous distances. There was some mission planned by NASA however that, as one of its tasks, was to take up close up photos of the landing sight in a fly-by. It was suppose to happen this year or something, i forget what it was.

Also, i don't see how that could be "ultimate proof". The problem with such "proof" would be that the theory says the government lied and the proof against it could be easily countered by "the government is lying again". I think the ultimate proof is the fact that the evidence presented by conspiracy theorists is usually flat out wrong or the type that completely misses the point or tries to convince naive people of certain "problems" based on our everyday experience. Such an experience of course, doesn't accure inside a vacuum.
 
sneez said:
now, they produce huge amount of evidence that indeed moon landing happened in the studio...

First of all, this should be in the "Debunking" area. This has been covered several times before.

Second: I find it VERY offensive that anyone could think that the Moon landings were faked. This is the single greatest engineering feat of the 20th century, and yet some people which have little to no engineering knowledge think they can "prove" it never happened. All of the supposed "proof" of a conspiracy is total B.S., and has been disproved MANY times.

The fact is we landed on the moon, a great triumph for the United States (and mankind), and there is a huge amount of irrevocable evidence that it happened.

sneez said:
my question appart can you dispute that evidence

I won't even dignify this with an answer. All I will say is that I guarantee any and all "evidence" provided in the videos can be completely blown away. The videos are two hours of total crud.
 
Last edited:
ups sorry, question answered thank you all ...
 
sneez said:
now, they produce huge amount of evidence that indeed moon landing happened in the studio...
No, they don't. Maybe they think they have evidence, but I'd even venture to say that most such guys know they are full of crap but just spew it for the sake of making money. Most of this comes from a guy named Hoagland, who has spent enough time on it that he can't have completely ignored the debunking of his crap. He has to know he's wrong unless he is actually mentally ill.

Question answered by Penguino, thread closed.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top