Falling rod with a mass on either end

  • Thread starter Thread starter clope023
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Mass Rod
AI Thread Summary
A wooden rod with negligible mass, 85.0 cm long, is pivoted at its center with a rat and mouse clinging to either end. The system is released from a horizontal position, and the goal is to find the speeds of the animals as the rod swings vertically. The correct approach involves calculating the potential energy changes for both animals, considering their differing masses, and applying energy conservation principles. The final formula derived for their speed is v = √(2gR((ma-mb)/(ma+mb))). The discussion concludes with the user successfully resolving their confusion about the signs in the energy equations.
clope023
Messages
990
Reaction score
130
[SOLVED] Falling rod with a mass on either end

Homework Statement



A wooden rod of negligible mass and length 85.0cm is pivoted about a horizontal axis through its center. A white rat with mass 0.520kg clings to one end of the stick, and a mouse with mass 0.250kg clings to the other end. The system is released from rest with the rod horizontal.


If the animals can manage to hold on, what are their speeds as the rod swings through a vertical position?

Homework Equations



(K1a + K1b) + (U1a + U1b) = (K2a + K2b) + (U2a + U2b)

U = mgR, R = 1/2d of the rod
K1 = 0
U2 = 0


The Attempt at a Solution



(magR + mbgR) = 1/2v^2(ma + mb)

gR (ma+mb) = 1/2v^2 (ma+mb)

2gr = v^2, v = \sqrt{2gr}

v = 2.9m/s wrong

not sure what I'm doing wrong here.

any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The rat goes down, losing potential energy and the mouse goes up gaining potential energy. The potential energy changes don't add. They subtract. They have different signs.
 
hmmm, so you're saying it would be:

magR - mbgR = 1/2mav^2 + 1/2mbv^2?

and from here would'nt it be:

gR(ma-mb) = 1/2v^2(ma+mb)

\sqrt{2gr((ma-mb)/(ma+mb))} = v?
 
I think so. In fact, I know so. Does that work?
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
I think so. In fact, I know so. Does that work?

yes it did! wow I was stuck on that one for hours and I was actually thinking of changing the signs, but when I did it I changed the signs of both the potential and kinetic energies so they (the masses) both canceled out anyways, thanks for pointing out the difference; thanks again!
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top