Farday's law in two conducting loops

AI Thread Summary
Faraday's Law states that a changing magnetic flux in one conducting loop induces an electromotive force (emf) in another loop, allowing currents I1 and I2 to influence each other. When a steady current I1 flows in loop 1, it generates a magnetic field that affects loop 2, but without a change in flux, the induced emf in loop 2 is zero. The discussion highlights the importance of induction coefficients, with self-inductance denoted as Lii and mutual inductance as Lij, which play a crucial role in the relationship between the currents. Oscillation of the currents I1 and I2 can occur under specific conditions, such as when there is a time-dependent change in current, leading to opposing currents that repel each other. Understanding these relationships requires working with differential equations to describe the dynamics of the currents over time.
scariari
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
consider two conducting loops with fixed geometries and at fixed positions. Let I1 and I2 be the currents flowing in the loops 1 and 2.

how does Faraday's Law allow the currents I1 and I2 to affect each other?

farday's law says that changing the flux between loops 1 will induce an emf in loop 2. where there are 2 loops at rest, a steady current I around loop 1 will produce a magnetic field B, where some of the field lines will pass through loop 2.
but does Faraday say anything without changing the flux?

Write down a set of two equations for the currents I1(t) and I1(t) in terms of the various induction coefficients.

induction coefficients might be the biggest problem here... if self inductance is Lii then coefficients of inductance are Lij. what exactly is the difference?

under which conditions on the coefficients can the currents I1 and I2 oscillate?

i am totally lost on this one. maybe if the coefficients are opposite? no clue!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by scariari
but does Faraday say anything without changing the flux?
Yes. He says the induced emf is zero in this case. Thus I think you got to work with time-dependent currents.

i am totally lost on this one.
I guess this will not be so hard once you have the correct formulae. Can you show your work?
 
increasing I1 for example, will have an affect on the flux of loop 2 by making it repel. This happens because the emf generated in loop 2 led to a current which was in such a direction that its field tended to cnacel this new flux. This means that the current in loop 2 is opposite to the current in loop 1, and opposite currents repel.

one equation for the current is:
I(t)=((epsilon)0/R)+ke^(-(R/L)t)

what distinguishes loop1 from 2? and i take it the induction coefficient is the epsilon?

oscillation occurs when there is a start and a stop of current, so if loop 1 and loop 2 had a gap in time of current they could oscillate, right?
 
I think you got to work out a differential equation, i.e., an equation of the form
<br /> \frac{dI}{dt} = \dots<br />
or even
<br /> \frac{d^{2}I}{dt^2} = \dots<br />
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top