Feather Terminal Velocity Comparison: Mars vs. Earth Atmospheric Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Worzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Mars
AI Thread Summary
In comparing terminal velocity for a feather dropped on Mars versus Earth, the discussion highlights the impact of gravity and atmospheric conditions. Mars has one-third the gravity of Earth and a significantly thinner atmosphere, which is 100 times less dense. The terminal velocity is influenced by gravitational force and atmospheric viscosity, with the latter being affected by temperature and pressure. While it is noted that viscosity is generally independent of pressure, the extreme low pressure on Mars raises questions about its effect on viscosity in this context. Overall, the consensus leans towards Mars providing a lower terminal velocity for the feather due to its weaker gravity and atmospheric conditions.
Worzo
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Firstly, this isn't my homework question. I was trying to answer another, broader question for a student, and it boiled down to this one. There's quite a subtle point here, I think, but I just can't grasp it.

Consider stable atmospheric conditions on Mars and Earth. A feather is dropped from a great height on both planents. Which planet gives the feather the higher terminal velocity?

Data given is:
- Mars gravity = (1/3)g
- Earth atmosphere: 1000mbar
- Mars atmosphere: 10mbar

So terminal velocity goes as square root of gravitational force and inverse square root of viscosity. I can't work out how the viscosity changes with temperature and pressure.

Gut feeling tells you that the weaker gravity (a third of Earth's) contributes to lowering the terminal velocity. However, doesn't the fact that the pressure is 100 times smaller contribute to the viscosity somehow?

I remember proving in kinetic theory that viscosity is independent of pressure (except for high pressures), but does that hold here? I can't help thinking temperature has something to do with it as well.

Any explanation/calculation of Terrestrial/Martian atmospheric viscosity would be most appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AFAIK, Mars' atmo is more akin to vacuum than it is to a real atmo.
 
DaveC426913 said:
AFAIK, Mars' atmo is more akin to vacuum than it is to a real atmo.

That's what I thought, but I can't find any expression for how the viscosity changes at low pressure.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top