Feynman diagram interpretation - 2 electrons in and 2 electrons out

catkin
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello :smile:

The question is from "Advanced Physics" by Adams and Allday. It is from section 9 "The Physics of Particles", "Practice Exam Questions". It is question 11, part c. The level of this study is between school and University.

Figure 9.5 represents a simple particle interaction. State the nature of the interaction and describe what happens to the particles involved. State three properties of the exchange particle.

[Figure 9.5 is in the attachment]

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


The particles in the interaction are leptons (electrons) so it must be a weak force interaction.

It looks like nothing happens to the particles involved! The same particles are present before and after the interaction (possibly at different energies).

It is not clear which way the exchange particle moves and there is no transfer of charge.

Because there is no transfer of charge and the weak force is acting, I guess the only unidentified particle must be the uncharged weak force exchange particle, the Z0.

I further guess that the directionless nature of the reaction means the exchange particle must be one that is its own anti-particle; again the Z0.

I don't like guessing -- it means lack of understanding :frown:

Illumination gratefully received.

As for the three properties, I don't think we are required to recall actual figures so how about: massive (hence very unstable), uncharged, own anti-partcle?

Best

Charles
 

Attachments

  • Figure 9.5.png
    Figure 9.5.png
    4 KB · Views: 428
Physics news on Phys.org
catkin said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The particles in the interaction are leptons (electrons) so it must be a weak force interaction.

Nope. The squiggly line represents a photon. W and Z bosons are represented by straight dashed lines.

It looks like nothing happens to the particles involved! The same particles are present before and after the interaction (possibly at different energies).

When two billiard balls collide, the same balls are present before and after the interaction. Does that mean that nothing happens to them??

It is not clear which way the exchange particle moves and there is no transfer of charge.

You don't need to know the direction of motion of the exchange particle. But you're right, there is no transfer of charge.
 
Thanks Tom :-)

Duh! I didn't consider that it might be an electromagnetic force interaction! We've been so focussed on weak and strong I missed the obvious.

Best

Charles
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Back
Top