Feynman Lectures on Physics - Rotation in 2 dimensions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding concepts from section 18-2 of The Feynman Lectures on Physics regarding rotation in two dimensions. The user raises two questions about the geometry involved, specifically the right angle at point P and the relationship between QP and rΔθ. Responses clarify that for small angles, sin(Δθ) approximates Δθ, allowing the use of QP = rΔθ instead of r * tan(Δθ). The conversation highlights the simplifications used in calculus and the historical context of mathematical approaches. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the nuances of angular relationships in physics.
ZirconiumAce
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This isn't really a 'problem', I'm just trying to follow Feynman's reasoning in section 18-2 of Volume 1 The Feynman Lectures on Physics. I've attached a png of the paragraph in question.

I have 2 issues with this:

1. If the length OQ = OP, how can there be a right angle at P(x,y)?

2. I don't understand why QP = r \Delta\theta, rather than r * tan (\Delta\theta)

Am I missing something? I've checked the latest errata and this isn't mentioned.

Thanks for your help.
 

Attachments

  • Feynman.png
    Feynman.png
    55.3 KB · Views: 562
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi ZirconiumAce! Welcome to PF! :wink:
ZirconiumAce said:
1. If the length OQ = OP, how can there be a right angle at P(x,y)?

2. I don't understand why QP = r \Delta\theta, rather than r * tan (\Delta\theta)

Because that's the way these ∆s work …

we ignore anything that's small compared with a ∆ (in the same way that we ignore dh2, compared with dh, when we do calculus proofs)

So ∆θ = sin∆θ = tan∆θ. :wink:

(sin∆θ = ∆θ - (∆θ)3/3! + …)
 
Ah yes a Taylor series. Mathematics back in the days of the slide rule I suppose. Now we don't bother with simplifications as much. Cheers! How about the right angle?
 
I've got it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top