Fictitious forces and artificial gravity

phys
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'd be extremely grateful if anyone could help me with this ... its mainly part iv) that I'm stuck on but the other parts build up to it! Thanks very much!

1. Homework Statement

I have a wheel shaped space station of radius 100m rotating about its symmetry axis (defined to be the z axis) at angular velocity w in order to create artificial gravity.

i) how fast does the space station have to rotate in order for artificial gravity at the rim to be the same as that on Earth (10m/s^2)

ii) show that the equations of motion for a free particle in a co-ordinate system fixed to the space station are :

x'' = 2wy' + w^2 x
y'' = -2wx' + w^2y
z'' = 0

('' denotes second derivate wrt time, ' denotes first derivative)

iii) show that by defining the variable u = x + iy the solution is

u = (a + bt) e^(-iwt)

iv) there is a shower in the space station of height 2m from the floor.
Ignoring the initial velocity as it flows out of the shower how long does it take the water to reach the floor?

How much is the water displaced horizontally when it reaches the floor?

Homework Equations


Coriolis force = -2w x v
Centrifugal force = -wxwxr

The Attempt at a Solution


i) I just equated w^2 r to 10 and solved to get w = 0.316 rad/s
ii) and iii) Managed to get these fine

iv) I'm not really sure whether I am supposed to use part 3 or not here...

To get the time I just used s = 0.5gt^2 where g = 10 and then solved to get t = 0.632 s

To get the horizontal distance I just used that the horizontal force is 2wy'. I then subbed in
y ' = gt and integrated twice to get x = (wgt^3)/3. subbing in for t and w I then got horizontal displacement is 26.6cm

I feel like I have made too many approximations and should have used part 3?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-08-30 at 09.06.02.png
    Screen Shot 2017-08-30 at 09.06.02.png
    10 KB · Views: 629
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if this will help, but I think Part iv is a little tricky. If you totally ignore velocity at the shower head, then the water will go nowhere and will still be in place when the shower head circles back around. I think they want you to only ignore the radial velocity of the water but keep the velocity tangent to the shower head circle. In that case, the water will travel in a horizontal line in your diagram. So you can figure the distance on the horizontal line from the shower head to the floor circle and the tangential velocity at the shower head and calculate the result. I don't think you would need to do any integrations as you have.
 
Thanks ... I think you just ignore the initial velocity. i.e. assume its starts from rest
Have I worked out the time to hit the ground correctly ?
 
The acceleration of the water relative to the station is not really constant as it falls. However, it is approximately constant over the 2 m distance, and so your answer is pretty accurate.

But, I think they probably want you to answer iv based on the result for iii. You can get a more accurate answer this way.

Yes, the initial velocity (relative to the station) is zero.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top