Field between two parallel postive plate different voltages

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the electric field between two parallel plates with different positive voltages. It highlights that the electric field lines should be straight and equally spaced, pointing from the higher to the lower potential plate. The concept of potential is clarified as relative, emphasizing that only the potential difference affects the electric field. The presence of excess charges on the plates creates a repulsive force that influences free electrons between them. The analogy to gravitational potential illustrates that the slope, or change in potential, is what determines the behavior of charges in the field.
maxelcat
Messages
33
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


This was a one mark question on an AS paper.

upload_2017-10-12_10-7-22.png
[/B]

Homework Equations


[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


Mark scheme says straight lines, equally spaced lines pointing down and starting/ending on the plates. (which I totally get if one plate was 0V or negative) However, if you place the text positive charge very close to S (+1V) won't the repulsive force from S be larger than from R meaning the overall field at that point will be upwards?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential is a relative measure, not an absolute one. We can add or subtract the same amount to either of the potentials given and it will make no physical difference. The only thing that has a physical effect is potential difference. The lower (upper) plate will have excess negative (positive) charges on its surface because of the potential difference between the two plates, and those charges will repel any free electrons that are between the plates, whether they are near the lower or the upper plate.
 
Think of the gravitational analog, when you're climbing a hill what matters is the slope (change of gravitational potential over a horizontal displacement) not how far you are above the base of the hill.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top