Find Antinode Closest to x=0.25m in Standing Wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter lha08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nodes
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing a standing wave described by the equation 0.005sin(30x)cos(420t) m, with the goal of locating the antinode closest to x=0.25 m. The subject area pertains to wave mechanics and the properties of standing waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of antinodes and their relation to the standing wave equation. There is an exploration of the formula for locating antinodes and the values of x that correspond to maximum amplitude, with references to the spatial factor sin(kx).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the derivation of the initial formula for antinodes and clarifying the relationship between kx and x. Some guidance has been offered regarding the values of k and the series representation for maximum amplitude.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the given wave equation and are attempting to understand the implications of the wave number k in the context of the problem.

lha08
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the standing wave: 0.005sin(30x)cos(420t) m. Locate the antinode closest to x=0.25 m.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not really sure how to tackle this problem except that i know that antinodes occur at the crests of the standing wave and that the distance between antinodes is lamda/2. In the answers it says that: kXn=(2n+1)pi/2... Xn=(2n+1)pi/(2k) and when you plug in n=2 it is 0.261 m...does anyone know how they got the initial formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the spatial factor sin(kx). What values of x give the maximum amplitude?
 
Doc Al said:
Consider the spatial factor sin(kx). What values of x give the maximum amplitude?

aren't they pi/2, 3pi/2, 5pi/2, 7pi/2...etc?
 
lha08 said:
aren't they pi/2, 3pi/2, 5pi/2, 7pi/2...etc?
Good. But that's the value for kx, not x. (In this problem, k = 30.) How would you write that series using n, where n = 0, 1, 2, and so on? Compare that to the formula given.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K