Find equivalent resistance in this circuit

AI Thread Summary
To find the equivalent resistance Rab between nodes A and B, the relationship Rab = Vab/Iab is used, where Vab can be treated as a variable voltage source. The approach involves applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to set up equations for the circuit. The goal is to express the ratio Vab/Iab solely in terms of the resistances present in the circuit. It's confirmed that finding Iab with a chosen voltage source Vab is a valid method. Ultimately, the equations can be rearranged to derive Rab without needing to solve for Iab or Vab independently.
Hyperfluxe
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://session.masteringengineering.com/problemAsset/1515645/4/Steif.ch02.p28.jpg
Find the equivalent resistance between node A and B, knowing that Rab = Vab/Iab

Homework Equations


KCL and KVL, I know.


The Attempt at a Solution


There is nothing in series or parallel here, so what I did is set up KCL equations and KVL loop equations (top and bottom loops), so 6 equations with 6 unknowns and I can find Iab. I don't know how to find Vab though...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't find Vab, you stick a voltage source there (value of your choosing, or just leave it as a variable, "Vab"). The equivalent resistance Rab is given by the ratio Vab/Iab.

Presumably the Vab variable will cancel out in the workings leaving you with an expression for Rab in terms of R alone.
 
I'm still confused though, is my method of finding Iab correct?
 
Hyperfluxe said:
I'm still confused though, is my method of finding Iab correct?

Well, the approach of finding Iab given a source voltage Vab is correct. But you haven't shown the details of your work so it's not possible to say more.
 
Hyperfluxe said:
I'm still confused though, is my method of finding Iab correct?

You don't need to solve the equations to find Iab or Vab their own.

Rab = Vab/Iab

so reaarange the equations until you get one for the ratio Vab/Iab in terms of the resistors only.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top