Find Magnitude of Vector a: Solve Ax2 + Ay2 + Az2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gattz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
AI Thread Summary
To find the magnitude of vector a represented as axi + ayj + azk, the correct formula is the square root of the sum of the squares of its components: √(ax² + ay² + az²). The azk term indicates the third dimension, making the vector three-dimensional rather than just two-dimensional. Using Pythagoras' theorem, one can visualize the magnitude calculation in a 3D coordinate system. The discussion clarifies that the hypotenuse of az² + ay² can be calculated first, followed by finding the hypotenuse with ax², confirming the overall approach. Understanding these components is essential for accurately determining vector magnitudes in three dimensions.
Gattz
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
If you are given vector a = axi + ayj + azk and you want to find the magnitude of a, then would you just do the square root of ax2 + ay2? If so, then what about az? What is azk actually? I'm a little unclear about it being related to a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would do the square root of ax2 + ay2 + ay2.
Sorry, I don't know how to make superscripts. Too bad they don't copy.
 
You mean az for the last one?

And to do superscripts, just put "[.SUP] [/SUP.]" without the quotations and periods (caps don't matter). And it's for subscripts.
 
Yes az, and thanks for the tip.
 
Just a quick explanation for that azk term, if you still are unclear about it.

k adds another dimension to the vector. When a vector is only in i,j it's 2D and i,j,k is 3D. See it as drawing it in a xyz-coordinate system instead of a xy one. And as was mentioned earlier, it changes things a little bit when it comes to the magnitude. You wouldn't just do the √(ax2 + ay2), because then you wouldn't take the third dimension into consideration. From there it's not too big of a leap to √(ax2 + ay2 + az2).

You can prove it using Pythagoras' theroem. If you draw a 3D vector in a coordinate system you can figure it out. It can be a bit tricky to see, but it's not impossible.
 
You could do it that way and you'll get the same answer.
It would be interesting to prove that . . .
 
Actually I just realized that the square root of az2 + ay2 is the hypothesis. So I guess it makes sense.
 
Back
Top