Find phase angle of RLC network

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the phase angle in an RLC circuit. The user attempts to solve the problem using two different methods, initially expressing the circuit's voltages and impedances but encounters incorrect results. The second approach involves calculating the potential drop across the inductor using the current and impedance, which is suggested to be more effective. Clarification is requested on the details of the second method to ensure accurate calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying circuit analysis techniques to determine the phase angle.
D.B0004
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Please see attachment for circuit and parameters.

Homework Equations


i --> 90 phase angle for inductor so Z of inductor = 0.5<90
sum of voltages = 0
#<40 = #*cos(40) + i*sin(40)*#

The Attempt at a Solution


shteii01 - 100 + 0.5<90 + V2<theta = 0 --> 100 + 0.5*cos(90) + i*sin(90)0.5+V2*cos(theta)+i*sin(theta)*V2 = 0 --> two unknowns
OR
delta V = I * Z and then take V1 - delta V to find V2. The work seems simple but I get the wrong answer! Note that the answer I have in the attachment was my first solution which I did in my head - not the one I got from the methods shown above. Thanks for the help.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-02-12 at 6.49.54 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-02-12 at 6.49.54 PM.png
    10.7 KB · Views: 511
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your first approach because you would appear to be adding voltages and impedances together in some way. But your second approach should work just fine. Since you are given the current you can find the potential drop across the inductor as you say. Can you show the details of that attempt?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top