Find Speed of Cylindrical Shell on Incline-Loop

AI Thread Summary
A cylindrical shell rolling down an incline without slipping can be analyzed using conservation of energy principles. The initial potential energy converts into both translational and rotational kinetic energy as it reaches the top of the loop. The moment of inertia for the cylinder must be considered, leading to the correct velocity formula. While sqrt(2gh) applies to a block, for the cylindrical shell, the appropriate equation is vf = sqrt(gh). This approach accurately determines the speed of the shell at the top of the loop.
chrisfnet
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/5277/loopb.jpg

A cylindrical shell is released from rest and rolls down an incline without slipping. Find speed of shell at the top of the loop.

h(incline) = 2.0m
h(loop) = 1.3m

The Attempt at a Solution



vf = sqrt(g * yi)
vf = sqrt(9.8m/s^2 * 2.0m)
vf = 4.42719m/s = vi(loop)

KEi = PEf + KEf
1/2mvi^2 = mgy + 1/2mvf^2 + 1/2mr^2(v^2/r^2)
1/2vi^2 = gy + 1/2vf^2 + 1/2vf^2
1/2(4.42719m/s)^2 = -9.8m/s^2(1.3m) + 1/2vf^2 + 1/2vf^2
vf = 1.71464m/s


Would this be correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No. First, it would be v_{f}=\sqrt{2gh} but you can't use that equation anyway because in addition to translational kinetic energy, there is rotational kinetic energy.

Start off by looking up or deriving the moment of inertia of the cylinder for the rotation. Use your conservation of energy equation with change in potential energy on one side and change in rotational and translational kinetic energy on the other. Because the cylinder is rolling without slipping, you can find the angular velocity in terms of the linear velocity. Now you can solve for linear velocity.
 
Actually, sqrt(2gh) would be right if it were a block going down the incline. However, it's not. Since it's a cylindrical shell, the equation sqrt(gh) is correct.

I'd use:

mgh = 1/2mvf^2 + 1/2Iwf^2

Which simplifies to vf = sqrt(gh) after substitution.

This would give me the velocity at the bottom of the incline.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top