Find tension between blocks 2 & 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rey4312
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tension between three connected blocks with given masses, assuming no friction. The user initially sets up free body diagrams (FBD) for the blocks but struggles to determine the tension forces accurately. The community suggests labeling the tensions as "T1" and "T2" and emphasizes that the acceleration is the same for all blocks. The user realizes the importance of including the weight (W = mg) of the hanging block in their calculations. Ultimately, they find a way to incorporate the masses and acceleration into their equations to solve for tension.
Rey4312
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are three blocks connected by strings as shown in the figure. Each block has the mass as following mass,
m1=0.8kg
m2=2.2kg
m3=1.7kg
Assuming there is no friction,


Homework Equations



F=MA

The Attempt at a Solution



In my FBD of the hanging box
\uparrow <--- Tension
[]
\downarrow <--- W=mg

^^ in y direction: T-W=0
T=W

The FBD of the box on the table
\uparrow <---Normal Force
[] \rightarrow <--- Tension
\downarrow <--- W=mg

^^ x direction: t=0
y direction: Fn-W=O

But I am completely confused on how to find the tension of the boxes
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2012-02-29 at 4.23.01 PM.png
    Screen shot 2012-02-29 at 4.23.01 PM.png
    17.7 KB · Views: 698
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Rey4312! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Call the tensions "T1" and "T2", and the acceleration "a" (it'll be the same for all three boxes, won't it? :wink:)

Then do F = ma three times, once for each box, and solve …

what do you get? :smile:
 
But if i do that the acceleration = 0 and so it makes all the forces 0... right??or am i missing something and it should be gravity?
 
Yes, you need to include W (=mg) for the hanging box.
 
W for the hanging box is 16.66

and W for box 2(m2) is 21.56...

Where do i go from there, because that doesn't give me acceleration...
 
i figured it out... i ended up having to do m2a+m1a
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top