Find the apogee from v at perigee, perigee, g, and the radius of Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natchanon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Radius
AI Thread Summary
To find the apogee and orbital period of a satellite given its perigee and tangential speed at perigee, one can utilize the gravitational constant g and the Earth's radius without needing the Earth's mass. The relationship between gravitational acceleration and the gravitational parameter allows for the calculation of the necessary parameters. By applying conservation of angular momentum, the maximum radius can be derived from the perigee and the velocities involved. The discussion clarifies that the gravitational parameter can be inferred from g and the Earth's radius, facilitating further calculations. This approach enables the completion of the problem without directly using the Earth's mass.
Natchanon
Messages
31
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Satellite orbits the Earth and its perigee r_min and tangential speed at perigee v_pe are given. The problem says do not use mass of Earth in the calculation, and use the only the constants g = 9.8 and radius of Earth 6380 km. I'm supposed to find the apogee and orbital period, but not using mass of Earth makes things seem so complicated. And the formula for period itself has mass of Earth in it.

Homework Equations


where ecc is eccentricity
perigee = r_min + radius of Earth
r_max = (1+ecc)*r_min/(1-ecc)

The Attempt at a Solution


Since argular momentum is conserved,
m v_pe r_min = m v_ap r_max
=> r_max = v_pe r_min / v_ap
I tried to find v_ap, but that the formula has mass of Earth in it, so I can't use that.
Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
But given g and the radius of the Earth you can infer the gravitational parameter ##\mu = GM_e##, right?
 
gneill said:
But given g and the radius of the Earth you can infer the gravitational parameter ##\mu = GM_e##, right?
So what you meant is
g = GM/r_earth^2 = μ/r_earth^2
=> g*r_earth^2 = μ ? That makes sense. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes gneill
Natchanon said:
So what you meant is
g = GM/r_earth^2 = μ/r_earth^2
=> g*r_earth^2 = μ ? That makes sense. Thank you.
Yup. And so you can proceed with the rest of the usual basic orbital motion equation lexicon.
 
  • Like
Likes Natchanon
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top