Find the eigenfrequencies for systems

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenfrequencies for a system described by coupled differential equations involving variables x and theta. The original poster expresses uncertainty in determining appropriate forms for x(t) and theta(t) that satisfy the given equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different forms for x(t) and theta(t), with one suggesting polynomial forms and another proposing sinusoidal substitutions. There is also a discussion about the implications of neglecting the theta-dot^2 term in the equations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants questioning the validity of assumptions made about the terms in the equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding potential substitutions to simplify the problem, but there is no consensus on how to proceed effectively.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's unfamiliarity with matrix eigenproblems and the potential complexity introduced by the non-linear term in the equations. The discussion also highlights the challenge of formulating the system in a way that allows for standard eigenfrequency analysis.

roeb
Messages
98
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[tex](M + m) \ddot x + m l \ddot\theta - ml \dot\theta ^2\theta = 0[/tex]

[tex]\ddot\theta + \frac{\ddot x}{l} + \frac{g}{l}\theta = 0[/tex]

I am not quite sure how to get a x(t) and theta(t) that actually fit for these equations...
For the second equation, I was thinking something like
x(t) = At^2 + Bt+C
theta(t) = Dt^2 + Et + C, but of course that doesn't work.

I know how to find the eigenfrequencies for systems that say have a Ae^(iwt) term in them, but for something like this, I have no idea... If I could get the correct forms of x(t) and theta(t) I think I could probably find them, but I am a bit lost in how to get the forms for something like this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


I would think in terms of trying to cast this as a matrix eigenproblem, but that last term in the first equation somewhat messes things up with the theta-dot^2 factor. Are you sure you have this written correctly?
 


Thanks for your reply.
It is written correctly; however, I *may* (not positive but upon thinking about it..) be able to say that the theta-dot^2 term is small so that it is effectively zero...
[tex] (M + m) \ddot x + m l \ddot\theta = 0[/tex]
[tex] \ddot\theta + \frac{\ddot x}{l} + \frac{g}{l}\theta = 0[/tex]

I'm afraid I'm not quite sure how to proceed even if this were the case. I am not familiar exactly with matrix eigenproblems.

If this were a pure math problem I suppose I would do something like
(A-I*lambda)x = 0 but since I don't have the system of equations in terms of x(t) and theta(t) I'm not quite sure what to do.
 
Last edited:


"...since I don't have the system of equations in terms of x(t) and theta(t) I'm not quite sure what to do." But if you were to substitute x = X*sin(omega*t) and theta = Theta*sin(omega*t), then you would have such a system.

But dropping that theta-dot^2 term seems shaky unless you have some physical argument for it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K