Find the linear acceleration of the bicycle

AI Thread Summary
The bicycle has wheels with a diameter of 0.620 m, leading to a circumference of approximately 1.95 m. It accelerates uniformly from an initial angular velocity of 19.2 rad/s to a final angular velocity of 28.9 rad/s over 20.7 seconds. The angular acceleration is calculated by dividing the change in angular velocity by the time. Using the formula for linear acceleration, the result is 0.43 m/s², indicating the bicycle's speed increases by this amount each second. Thus, the linear acceleration of the bicycle is confirmed to be 0.43 m/s².
BJN153
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A bicycle has wheels with a diameter of 0.620 m. It accelerates uniformly and the rate of rotation of its wheels increases from 183 rpm to 275 rpm in a time of 20.7 s. Find the linear acceration of the bicycle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the diameter is 0.620m, then what's the circumference?
If you know the angular initial and final velocity, you can find angular acceleration by dividing by the given time.
From step one, find the linear acceleration by dividing the angular acceleration by circumference.
 


The linear acceleration of the bicycle can be calculated using the formula a = (vf - vi)/t, where vf and vi are the final and initial velocities, and t is the time taken.

First, we need to convert the rotations per minute (rpm) to radians per second (rad/s). This can be done by multiplying the rpm by 2π/60, as there are 2π radians in one revolution and 60 seconds in one minute.

So, the initial angular velocity (ωi) of the wheels can be calculated as ωi = (183 rpm) * (2π/60) = 19.2 rad/s.

Similarly, the final angular velocity (ωf) can be calculated as ωf = (275 rpm) * (2π/60) = 28.9 rad/s.

Now, we can plug these values into the formula for linear acceleration: a = (28.9 rad/s - 19.2 rad/s) / (20.7 s) = 0.43 m/s^2.

Therefore, the linear acceleration of the bicycle is 0.43 m/s^2. This means that every second, the speed of the bicycle increases by 0.43 m/s.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top