Find the speed of the source (Doppler Effect)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed of a bicycle using the Doppler Effect, specifically focusing on the frequency shifts of a bell ringing at 3000 Hz as the bike approaches and moves away from an observer. A 30 Hz total change in frequency is noted, leading to confusion about how to apply the Doppler equations correctly. Participants clarify that the frequency shifts when approaching and receding are not symmetric, emphasizing the need to derive two separate equations for the observed frequencies. The correct approach involves subtracting the frequency equations for the two scenarios to find the speed of the bicycle. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in solving the problem.
mastermind1
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
A kid is riding a bike and is ringing bell of 3000 Hz. You are standing still on the sidewalk.When the bicycle moves toward you, you hear a shift in the frequency of the bell. In addition, when the bicycle moves away from you, you hear a different shift in the frequency of the bell. If there is a 30 Hz change in the frequencies that you hear for the bell as the bicycle approaches you and then moves away from you, what is the speed (in m/s) of the bicycle? (Write your answer to the nearest 0.01 m/s.)

1. Homework Statement

Frequency(source)(fs) = 3000 Hz
speed(observer)(vo) = 0 m/s
Frequency(towards)(ft)= 3030 Hz (NOT SURE)
Frequency(away)(fa) = 2970 Hz (NOT SURE)
speed of sound(v) = 343 m/s

Homework Equations



fo = ((v+vo)/(v-vs)) * fs Bike is moving TOWARDS me
fo = ((v-vo)/(v+vs)) * fs Bike is moving AWAY from me

The Attempt at a Solution



Towards
------------
3030Hz/3000Hz = (343 m/s) / (343 m/s - vs)
(1.01)(343 m/s - vs) = 343 m/s
345.20 m/s - 1.01 vs = 343 m/s
vs = 2.18 m/s

I do the same thing using the AWAY equation, and i get the same answer.
However, that answer is incorrect. I do not know what I am doing wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 30 Hz difference are between "towards you" and "away from you". They are not relative to the 3000 Hz.
 
mfb said:
The 30 Hz difference are between "towards you" and "away from you". They are not relative to the 3000 Hz.

Could you please elaborate on that. And, give me a hint.
 
If the bike approaches you, the frequency is x, a bit higher than 3000 Hz.
If the bike moves away from you, the frequency is y, a bit lower than 3000 Hz.
x - y = 30 Hz.
Find formulas for x and y and solve the equations, there is no trick involved.
 
mfb said:
If the bike approaches you, the frequency is x, a bit higher than 3000 Hz.
If the bike moves away from you, the frequency is y, a bit lower than 3000 Hz.
x - y = 30 Hz.
Find formulas for x and y and solve the equations, there is no trick involved.

That's what I am doing. I added and subtracted 30Hz.
 
You used x - 3000 Hz = 30 Hz and 3000 Hz - y = 30 Hz, but that's not right. It would imply x-y = 60 Hz.
 
mfb said:
You used x - 3000 Hz = 30 Hz and 3000 Hz - y = 30 Hz, but that's not right. It would imply x-y = 60 Hz.

So you are saying that 30Hz is the total change in frequency I hear for towards and away. That means that I hear 15 Hz for towards and 15 Hz for away.
If so, then it is 3000-15=2985(away) and 3000+15=3015(towards). Then I just use the equation I used above to get the answer.
 
mastermind1 said:
So you are saying that 30Hz is the total change in frequency I hear for towards and away.
That's what the problem statement says.
mastermind1 said:
That means that I hear 15 Hz for towards and 15 Hz for away.
It is not, the doppler shift is not symmetric.
 
mfb said:
That's what the problem statement says.It is not, the doppler shift is not symmetric.

I don't think I get it yet. You will need to help me with equations.
 
  • #10
All necessary equations are in the thread already, you just have to combine them.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
All necessary equations are in the thread already, you just have to combine them.

You know what I am trying to tell you. If I had understood what you were trying to tell me, I would have done it by now.
I don't get it.
 
  • #12
mastermind1 said:
You know what I am trying to tell you. If I had understood what you were trying to tell me, I would have done it by now.
I don't get it. It's just one question, and I am dedicated enough to waste hours on it. It's certainly not going to make any difference to my overall grade in class if I get it wrong. I am not good at physics, and that is why I am having trouble with this.
 
  • #13
mastermind1 said:
You know what I am trying to tell you.
No I don't know. The problem got reduced from a problem about the Doppler effect to a topic your classes covered several years ago: plugging in equations and numbers into each other.
 
  • #14
mfb said:
No I don't know. The problem got reduced from a problem about the Doppler effect to a topic your classes covered several years ago: plugging in equations and numbers into each other.

You have been telling me to do the same thing over and over, and I don't understand it. You are an expert. And, I appreciate your help.
But, if I am your student in this case, and I am not understanding it, then you should help me with a different approach. Please, help me in a different way.
 
  • #15
There is only one reasonable approach, and I don't know how to explain it differently, sorry.
 
  • #16
mfb said:
You used x - 3000 Hz = 30 Hz and 3000 Hz - y = 30 Hz, but that's not right. It would imply x-y = 60 Hz.
So would it be 3000-60?
 
  • #17
Darious Warren said:
So would it be 3000-60?
Definitely not.
 
  • #18
SammyS said:
Definitely not.
Wait! I have a question. When mfb said x-y=30, does he mean that the x and y values are the frequencies the observer hears?
 
  • #19
Darious Warren said:
Wait! I have a question. When mfb said x-y=30, does he mean that the x and y values are the frequencies the observer hears?
Yes, he is using x and y for frequencies to make a statement about his understanding of the problems statement.

Well this is what @mfb wrote in Post #4.
If the bike approaches you, the frequency is x, a bit higher than 3000 Hz.
If the bike moves away from you, the frequency is y, a bit lower than 3000 Hz.​
.
 
  • #20
Okay. I got the idea of what the answer is! Thank you @SammyS
 
  • #21
mastermind1 said:
A kid is riding a bike and is ringing bell of 3000 Hz. You are standing still on the sidewalk.When the bicycle moves toward you, you hear a shift in the frequency of the bell. In addition, when the bicycle moves away from you, you hear a different shift in the frequency of the bell. If there is a 30 Hz change in the frequencies that you hear for the bell as the bicycle approaches you and then moves away from you, what is the speed (in m/s) of the bicycle? (Write your answer to the nearest 0.01 m/s.)

1. Homework Statement

Frequency(source)(fs) = 3000 Hz
speed(observer)(vo) = 0 m/s
Frequency(towards)(ft)= 3030 Hz (NOT SURE)
Frequency(away)(fa) = 2970 Hz (NOT SURE)
speed of sound(v) = 343 m/s

Homework Equations


fo = ((v+vo)/(v-vs)) * fs Bike is moving TOWARDS me
fo = ((v-vo)/(v+vs)) * fs Bike is moving AWAY from me

The Attempt at a Solution

: Towards
3030Hz/3000Hz = (343 m/s) / (343 m/s - vs)
(1.01)(343 m/s - vs) = 343 m/s
345.20 m/s - 1.01 vs = 343 m/s
vs = 2.18 m/s

I do the same thing using the AWAY equation, and i get the same answer.
However, that answer is incorrect. I do not know what I am doing wrong.
You made some error in multiplying (1.01)(343) which is 346.43. This is a huge error b/c if hold off on that multiplication and do some manipulation, you get (1.01)(343) − 343 = (1.01)vs ..
Of course, that left hand side is just (0.01)(343) → 3.43

If you do the AWAY carefully and use 3000 − 30 → 2970 (Hz) , you get a slightly greater bicycle speed .

That confirms the interpretation of the problem given by @mfb .

Take the two frequency equations: towards and away and introduce a way to distinguish the observed TOWARD frequency from the observed AWAY frequency.

## \displaystyle f_{o\,T} = \frac{v+v_o}{v-v_s} \cdot f_s \ \ ## Bike is moving TOWARDS me

## \displaystyle f_{oA} = \frac{v-v_o}{v+v_s} \cdot f_s \ \ ## Bike is moving AWAY from me

Just subtract the second equation from the first, That should give the difference in the two frequencies as pointed out by @mfb . A little trickier Algebra but do-able.
 
  • #22
The thread is from 2015, it is unlikely that OP is still active here.
 
  • #23
mfb said:
The thread is from 2015, it is unlikely that OP is still active here.
LOL !

I suppose I saw it in the current list because of the post by @Darious Warren . I didn't pay attention to the date other than Sept.

Oh well, it kept me busy for a while.
 
Back
Top