Find Thevenin Equiv. at a-b in Circuit Below

  • Thread starter Thread starter VinnyCee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Thevenin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the Thevenin equivalent at terminals a-b in a given circuit. The original poster calculates the Thevenin voltage (V_th) using KCL and voltage equations, arriving at V_th = (R_2 * V_S / R_1) + V_S. A participant questions the necessity of removing independent sources when applying a test current to find Thevenin resistance (R_th), suggesting that this leads to a contradiction of negative resistance. The conversation highlights confusion regarding the application of test currents and the treatment of independent sources in the analysis. Clarification is sought on the correct approach to determine R_th, especially in the context of operational amplifiers.
VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the Thevenin equivalent at terminals a-b in the circuit below.

http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/2250/chapter5problem36gq0.jpg

Homework Equations



KVL, KCL, v = i R, current and voltage equations for Operation Amplifier

The Attempt at a Solution



So I altered the diagram a bit.

http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/4382/chapter5problem36part2pr4.jpg

I_1\,=\,\frac{V_S}{R_1}

I_2\,=\,\frac{V_S\,-\,V_1}{R_2}

KCL at V_S)

I_1\,=\,-I_2\,\,\longrightarrow\,\,\frac{V_S}{R_1}\,=\,-\frac{V_S\,-\,V_1}{R_2}

V_1\,=\,\frac{R_2\,V_S}{R_1}\,+\,V_S

V_{Th}\,=\,V_1\,=\,\frac{R_2\,V_S}{R_1}\,+\,V_S

Is that right? If so, I will now put a test current of 1 Amp at the terminals to get the R_{Th}.

I_2\,=\,1

\frac{V_S\,-\,V_1}{R_2}\,=\,1\,\,\longrightarrow\,\,V_1\,=\,V_S\,-\,R_2

Now, using v = i R to get the Thevenin equivalent resistance.

R_{Th}\,=\,\frac{V_1}{1}\,=\,V_S\,-\,R_2

Does that seem correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems fine to me.
 


do you have to put in a test current and does it have 2 be 1??
 


Hi, I know this is old but I have the exact same problem. I've done it the same as the guy in the first post up until finding V_th, but after that I'm confused.

When he applied a test current, shouldn't he have removed all of the independent sources? (Namely V_s).

This would reduce the node voltage equation down to

V_p = 0 = V_n

(V_n - V_th)/R_2 = I_(test)

(0 - V_th)/R_2 = I_(test)

-V_th/R_2 = I_(test)

R_th = V_th/I_(test) = -R_2

Which is invalid since it's a negative resistance, therefore you have to assume that R_th = 0?

Can somebody explain if this thinking is valid? Since in the thread starter's solution for some reason he doesn't take out the independent voltage source when applying the test current, can someone explain why he doesn't?

Or can someone in general just explain the last step for finding R_th since I understand the finding V_th its just that last part that I don't understand what the original poster did exactly or why he didn't take out the independent source.

PS: For some reason my sub notation isn't working completely right, I_(test), V_th, R_th are the test current, thevenin voltage, and thevenin resistance respectively.
 


I just ran across this problem I think Rth = 0 and Vth = Voc

I have a similar problem with a inverting op-amp.

The definition of an ideal op-amp is that the input has an infinite resistance and the output has an impedance of 0. The output of an ideal op-amp will always have the same voltage, it will not vary with the load.

Does anyone agree or disagree with my logic?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top