Calculate Total Energy: Solve Homework Statement

AI Thread Summary
The total energy of a system is calculated by combining translational and rotational kinetic energy, expressed as Total energy = 1/2 m V² + 1/2 I W². The correct calculation yields a total energy of 49.152 Joules. A discrepancy arose when another solution incorrectly assumed the bowling ball was a uniform sphere, leading to an unnecessary and flawed calculation of the moment of inertia. Additionally, the failure to square the angular velocity was identified as an error in that solution. The original method and result were confirmed to be accurate.
Neon32
Messages
68
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



upload_2016-12-25_13-37-11.png


Homework Equations


Total energy = Translational kinetic energy + Rotational kinetic energy
Total energy= 1/2 m V2 + 1/2 I W2

The Attempt at a Solution


W= v/r = 3.20/0.100 = 32 rad/sec
Total energy= 1/2 m V2+ 1/2 I W[2
Total energy = 1/2 (8)(3.20)2 + 1/2 (1.60x10-2) (32)2=49.152 Joule

I found a different answer in solution. Why did he find the moment of inerta? it was already given in the problem + why didn't he square the angular velocity? Please tell me why he did that and if my answer or his answer is correct.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-12-25_13-44-2.png
    upload_2016-12-25_13-44-2.png
    16.8 KB · Views: 477
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method and result are correct. His is not.

The problem did not say that the bowling ball is a sphere of uniform density: the fact that the problem supplied the moment of inertia is evidence of this. So his assumption that it is a uniform sphere was flawed and his calculation of the moment of inertia was not only unnecessary but incorrect.

That he failed to square the angular velocity is also an error.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
gneill said:
Your method and result are correct. His is not.

The problem did not say that the bowling ball is a sphere of uniform density: the fact that the problem supplied the moment of inertia is evidence of this. So his assumption that it is a uniform sphere was flawed and his calculation of the moment of inertia was not only unnecessary but incorrect.

That he failed to square the angular velocity is also an error.
Alright. thanks for your help :).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top