Find Voltage Across 47-uF Capacitor: A Math Homework Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the voltage across a 47-uF capacitor at t = 2ms using the integral of current represented by two semi-circles. The user initially attempted to derive the voltage by integrating a semi-circle equation and evaluating the limits, but encountered discrepancies in the final answer. They found that their method led to a result roughly double the expected voltage, prompting questions about potential errors in their integral evaluation. Acknowledgment of the area under the curve as a simpler solution was also mentioned. Ultimately, the user seeks clarification on their integration process to resolve the inconsistency in their calculations.
Basher
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



IMG.jpg


referring to the attatchment. the current consists of two semi circles. the question asks me to find the voltage across a 47-uF capacitor when t = 2ms.

Homework Equations



v(t) = 1/C ∫ i(t)dt +v(t0) {I realize their has to be limits for the integrand,I just can't type them}

A = [1/2.π.r^2]

The Attempt at a Solution


now after a while of thinking i realized i could find the area under the curve of this circle with the area formula multiplied by the capacitnce which gives me the right answer.

However, in my first attempt i assigned an equation to the first semi circle. this was

(2√(1 - (t - 1)^2))

then i integrated this by using trigonometric substitution.

I came up with this

arcsin(t - 1) + (t - 1)*(√(1 - (t - 1)^2))

i then evaluated at the upper limit t giving me the same formula.

then evaluated at t0 = 0 giving (-π/2). i then subtracted this away from the top formula.

so my entire formula is arcsin(t - 1) + (t - 1)*(√(1 - (t - 1)^2)) + (π/2).

substituting t = 2ms I'm left with (π/2) + (π/2) = π.

i multiply by 10^-6 because i have to account for the axes being both in ms and mA.

then i divide by 47-μF giving me double the correct answer. roughly 66.48mV. however the answer is half that. where did is screw up with the integral evaluation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Basher! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
Basher said:
(2√(1 - (t - 1)^2))

nooo … √(4 - (t - 1)2)) :wink:
 
thanks. Did you have a crack at the problem?
 
or a bash? :wink:

no … i was perfectly happy with …
Basher said:
now after a while of thinking i realized i could find the area under the curve of this circle with the area formula multiplied by the capacitnce which gives me the right answer.

:smile:
 
hahaha. fair call. thanks
 
Back
Top