Finding angle for this resultant vector

AI Thread Summary
To find the angle between two displacements of 3.0 m and 3.8 m that result in specific resultant magnitudes (5.7 m, 2.5 m, and 3.6 m), the law of cosines and sines can be employed. The user initially struggled with the calculations and sought clarification on whether their approach was correct. It was confirmed that drawing the vectors head-to-tail is essential for accurate results. The discussion also included a similar problem with different magnitudes, indicating ongoing challenges with vector addition. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of proper vector representation and calculation methods in solving resultant vector problems.
RandellK02
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello I am working on this problem and just can't figure it out...


Consider two displacements, one of magnitude 3.0 m and another of magnitude 3.8 m. What angle between the directions of this two displacements give a resultant displacement of magnitude (a) 5.7 m, (b) 2.5 m, and (c) 3.6 m.



I have tried to draw the triangle and then use law of cosines and sines to find the appropriate angle but it seems to not be going the way I want it. Is this the correct solution or is there another way to go?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hello RandellK02! Welcome to PF! :wink:
RandellK02 said:
I have tried to draw the triangle and then use law of cosines and sines to find the appropriate angle but it seems to not be going the way I want it. Is this the correct solution or is there another way to go?

It should work.

(You are drawing the two given sides head-to-tail, aren't you?)

Show us one of your attempts. :smile:
 


Okay I will retry my math.
Thanks
 
Website states this is Incorrect.

Consider two displacements, one of magnitude 2.9 m and another of magnitude 4.4 m. What angle between the directions of this two displacements give a resultant displacement of magnitude (a) 5.6 m, (b) 2.9 m, and (c) 4.6 m.

98.1
40.7
75.0
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top