Finding Concavity: Solve with x's and y's | Rutgers

  • Thread starter Thread starter ACLerok
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine concavity for the given problem, the second derivative, y'', must be calculated. First, implicitly differentiate the equation to find the first derivative, y', and then differentiate again to obtain y''. After finding y'', substitute the point (1,2) into the expression. It is advised to avoid using the complicated expression for y(x) to simplify the process. This method effectively assesses the concavity of the curve.
ACLerok
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
http://www.eden.rutgers.edu/~cjjacob/images/calc.gif

I am given this problem to do but I'm not absolutely sure how to get through it. The way I would do is to find y' in terms of x's and y's and then plugin the point (1,2) and then take the derivative again and see if y'' is positve (curve up) or negative (curve down). Is this the best way to go about this problem or is it completely wrong or what?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Concavity is determined by the second derivative.

So implicitly differentiate twice and get an expression for d^2y/dx^2 in terms of x and y. Then plug in (1,2).

And whatever you do, ignore that ugly-looking expression for y(x)! That will make your life very, very, very miserable.

cookiemonster
 
Last edited:
cookiemonster said:
Yes. Concavity is determined by the second derivative.

So implicitly differentiate twice and get an expression for d^2y/dx^2 in terms of x and y. Then plug in (1,2).

And whatever you do, ignore that ugly-looking expression for y(x)! That will make your life very, very, very miserable.

cookiemonster

I calculated the first derivative and got 15x^(2)y+5x^(3)y'-3y^(2)-6xyy'+3y^(2)y'=0. is this correct and if so, what do i do after this? express in terms of y'?
 
Yes. Now solve for y' and then differentiate again. Then solve for y'' and substitute away any y' you see. Then just plug in values.

cookiemonster
 
Thanks! I got it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top