Finding E-field at a point away from a line charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E-field) components at a point P located on the positive y-axis due to a line charge extending along the x-axis. The participant successfully determined the Y-component of the E-field, yielding Ey = (Q/L)/(4ε0a), but is uncertain about the limits of integration and whether an X-component exists at point P. It is clarified that there is indeed an X-component of the E-field, despite point P being on the Y-axis. The conversation emphasizes understanding the contributions of both components in the context of the electric field generated by the line charge. The resolution of the integration limits is crucial for accurate calculations.
Geophyx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A line charge with a uniform linear charge density Lambda lies along the x-axis and extends from -∞ to 0. Determine the X-component, and Y-component of the E-field at a point P, a distance 'a' from the origin on the positive y-axis.

Homework Equations


dE= (k*dq/r^2)* r(hat)

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm getting tripped up on the limits of integration. Is there an x-component of the E-field at point P, even though the point lies on the Y-axis? I was able to calculate the Y-component and got Ey= (Q/L)/(4ε0a)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Geophyx said:

Homework Statement


A line charge with a uniform linear charge density Lambda lies along the x-axis and extends from -∞ to 0. Determine the X-component, and Y-component of the E-field at a point P, a distance 'a' from the origin on the positive y-axis.

Homework Equations


dE= (k*dq/r^2)* r(hat)

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm getting tripped up on the limits of integration. Is there an x-component of the E-field at point P, even though the point lies on the Y-axis? I was able to calculate the Y-component and got Ey= (Q/L)/(4ε0a)
Yes, there is an x-component.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top