Finding eigenvector QM 2x2 matrix

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a 2x2 quantum mechanics matrix. The participant initially struggles with normalizing the energy state and understanding the ratio method used in the lecture solution. They derive the eigenvalues and attempt to find the eigenvector for the ground state, but face confusion regarding the normalization process and the relationship between the coefficients A and B. After clarifications, they adjust their calculations, leading to a corrected normalization and a final probability result of 25%. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting ratios in eigenvector solutions.
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


I am having a issue with how my lecture has normalised the energy state in this question.
I will post my working and I will print screen his solution to the given question below, we have the same answer but I am unsure to why he has used the ratio method.
Q4. a), b), c)
upload_2017-12-18_22-55-48.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My solution for a), b), c)

a)
$$\hat H|E> = E|E> ;[1]$$

$$\hat H|E> - E|E>=0 ;[2]$$

$$\hat H|E> - IE|E>=0; [3]$$

$$(\hat H-IE)=0 ;[4]$$

$$\begin{pmatrix}0&-\Omega \\ \:-\Omega &\frac{2\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}\end{pmatrix}-E\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\ \:0&1\end{pmatrix}=0 ;[5] $$

So expanding out and finding the determinate of the following matrix

$$\begin{pmatrix}-E&-\Omega \\ \:-\Omega &\frac{2\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}-E\end{pmatrix}=0 ; [6]$$

$$\begin{pmatrix}-E&-\Omega \\ \:-\Omega &\frac{2\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}-E\end{pmatrix}= E^2-\frac{2E\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}-\Omega ^2=0 ;[7]$$

$$\left(E-\frac{3\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}\right)\left(E+\frac{\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}\right)=0 [8]$$

So solving gives me the following for ##E_{-}## and ##E_{+}##

$$E_{-}=\frac{3\Omega }{\sqrt{3}} ; [9]$$

$$E_{+}=-\frac{\Omega }{\sqrt{3}} ; [10]$$

b) I solved the eignvector for ground state in the following way

$$\begin{pmatrix}0&-\Omega \\ -\Omega &\frac{2\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}=-\frac{\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix} ; [11] $$

$$-\Omega B= -\frac{\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}A ; [12]$$

$$-\Omega A=-\frac{3}{\sqrt{3}}B ; [13]$$

So solving for both of these give ##A=\sqrt 3## so therfore:

$$E_{-}= |0> + \sqrt 3 |1> ; [14]$$

To normalize [14] I found the normalizing constant in the following way:

$$< E_{-} | E_{-} > = 1+3=4 ; [15]$$

$$N^2 < E_{-} | E_{-} > = 1 ; [16]$$

$$N^2=\frac{1}{4}; [17]$$

$$N= \frac{1}{2}; [18]$$

$$|E_{-}> = \frac{1}{2} |0> + \frac{\sqrt 3}{2} | 1 > ; [19]$$

c) $$P(1)=\left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right)^2=\frac{3}{4}=75\% [20]$$

Here is my lecture solution:
a)
upload_2017-12-18_23-34-17.png


b)
upload_2017-12-18_23-35-6.png
last part of b) and all of c)
upload_2017-12-18_23-35-45.png


I just don't understand the ratio method, it is a quicker method than mine or is it used more in more difficult matrices
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-18_22-55-48.png
    upload_2017-12-18_22-55-48.png
    37.2 KB · Views: 505
  • upload_2017-12-18_23-34-17.png
    upload_2017-12-18_23-34-17.png
    33.5 KB · Views: 484
  • upload_2017-12-18_23-35-6.png
    upload_2017-12-18_23-35-6.png
    36.5 KB · Views: 446
  • upload_2017-12-18_23-35-45.png
    upload_2017-12-18_23-35-45.png
    26.6 KB · Views: 427
Physics news on Phys.org
Taylor_1989 said:
b) I solved the eignvector for ground state in the following way

$$\begin{pmatrix}0&-\Omega \\ -\Omega &\frac{2\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix}=-\frac{\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}\begin{pmatrix}A\\ B\end{pmatrix} ; [11] $$

$$-\Omega B= -\frac{\Omega }{\sqrt{3}}A ; [12]$$

$$-\Omega A=-\frac{3}{\sqrt{3}}B ; [13]$$

So solving for both of these give ##A=\sqrt 3##
Check your work here. You cannot deduce that ##A=\sqrt 3## from equations [12] and [13]. These equations determine only the ratio of A to B.

So solving for both of these give ##A=\sqrt 3## so therfore:

$$E_{-}= |0> + \sqrt 3 |1> ; [14]$$
It looks like you let ##A = 1## here; whereas, you claimed ##A = \sqrt 3##.

In the lecture's solution you find
upload_2017-12-18_18-26-46.png


Check this. The last equation for ##\frac{A}{B}## does not look correct.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-18_18-26-46.png
    upload_2017-12-18_18-26-46.png
    6.9 KB · Views: 390
Sorry, that was a typo. It is meant to be ##A=\sqrt 3 B## so then I throught that as the simplest number for A would be 1 then B would be ##\sqrt 3## time that, so then I got the column vector: ##\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \sqrt{3}\end{pmatrix}##. Which the gave me ##E_{-} = |0> + \sqrt 3 | 1 >## and then I normalised
 
Taylor_1989 said:
It is meant to be ##A=\sqrt 3 B## so then I throught that as the simplest number for A would be 1 then B would be ##\sqrt 3## time that, so then I got the column vector: ##\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \sqrt{3}\end{pmatrix}##.
If you substitute ##A=1## in the relation ##A=\sqrt 3 B##, what do you get for ##B##?
 
Sorry, i will correct this and hopefully will have the correct ans this time. ##E_-=\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\end{pmatrix}## so then once I have normalized I get the following, ##|E_->=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}|0>+\frac{1}{2}|1>## So then my ans for c) would be ##25 ##%. Hopefully this is now correct?
 
Taylor_1989 said:
##E_-=\begin{pmatrix}1\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\end{pmatrix}## so then once I have normalized I get the following, ##|E_->=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}|0>+\frac{1}{2}|1>## So then my ans for c) would be ##25 ##%. Hopefully this is now correct?
Yes, that looks correct.
 
Ah thank you very much for the help
 
Back
Top